1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80273-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture of the occipital condyles and associated craniocervical ligament injury: Incidence, CT imaging and implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
6

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
33
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is probable that the prevalence of OCF is underestimated, because their diagnosis can be missed [9]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is probable that the prevalence of OCF is underestimated, because their diagnosis can be missed [9]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are even rarer in the child [1], and to our knowledge, only 14 cases of OCF in children are reported in the literature [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. The clinical relevance of these fractures has been recognised since Anderson and Montesano [2]classified them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Often difficult to identify based on plain radiographs alone, OCFs are now diagnosed more frequently due to the widespread use of CT in the standard trauma evaluation. 6,41 Occipital condyle fractures have typically been associated with lower cranial nerve palsies, particularly hypoglossal nerve injury. Of primary concern, however, is the potential of OCFs to destabilize the CCJ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cortes finos (1,2mmx1mm) permitem ótimo estudo de morfologia óssea e ligamentar, além de permitir excelente reconstrução tridimensional. 15 O tratamento conservador das fraturas de côndilo occipital evolui com bons resultados, ficando o paciente livre da dor cervical e mantendo o arco total de movimento do segmento envolvido após três meses de tratamento. Preconizam-se o uso de colar tipo Philadelphia para casos classificados como do tipo I e II de Anderson e Montesano, 7 e uma imobilização mais rígida, como halo gesso ou gesso Minerva pra as fraturas classificadas como tipo III, cabendo ainda o tratamento cirúrgico em casos de instabilidade persistente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified