2006
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2006-10328-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture of soft cellular solids—Case of non-crosslinked polyethylene foam

Abstract: Fracture mechanical properties of hard cellular solids (porous materials) with the Young modulus E larger than 3000 MPa have been well understood; scaling relations between fracture mechanical quantities and porosity are established, which can be explained by a theory based on the geometrical parameters of a cellular solid. In this study, we obtain experimentally the fracture energy of a very soft polyethylene foam with E around 1 MPa. We find scaling laws different from those for hard foams, which can be unde… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the soft foams, we established scaling laws for Young's modulus and the fracture surface energy as a function of φ. The scaling laws thus found are different from the ones established for well-studied hard cellular solids of Young's modulus typically around 3000 MPa [25]. Furthermore, we revealed for the same soft solidified foams a simple relation between the fracture surface energy (required at the crack initiation) and pulling velocity with a clear physical interpretation [26].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…For the soft foams, we established scaling laws for Young's modulus and the fracture surface energy as a function of φ. The scaling laws thus found are different from the ones established for well-studied hard cellular solids of Young's modulus typically around 3000 MPa [25]. Furthermore, we revealed for the same soft solidified foams a simple relation between the fracture surface energy (required at the crack initiation) and pulling velocity with a clear physical interpretation [26].…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…As a matter of fact, we confirmed, together with this independence of on d, eqs. (4), (12), and (13) directly in experimental studies on non-crosslinked polyethylene foam, 9) which will be discussed elsewhere. This is clearly the case of the two-dimensional network model as discussed in the above: we can make the bulk elasticity the same if we use the same number of original springs to make networks of the same size (i.e., if the volume fraction is the same).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) In the case of cellular solids 7) which include wood, cork, plant parenchyma, stereom of sea cucumber, trabecular bone, carbon and polymeric foams and porous materials, theories based on the unit cell structure have been successful to reveal that fracture mechanical properties can be well understood as a function of the relative density (i.e., volume fraction of solid in foam) in particular for hard cellular solids; 7,8) this is confirmed recently even for very soft foams but with different scaling relations. 9) Further progress has been propelled through more inclusion of detailed structures into theory such as imperfection and randomness, which leads to computational modeling based on finite-element method. 10,11) Similar trend prevails in most of modern theoretical treatments of high performance composites, for example, nacre, 12) bone, 13) and carbon nanotube composite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,19 Recently, a very soft polyethylene foam with E around 1 MPa has been studied, and scaling laws different from those for hard porous materials were established. 20 Here, we study the fracture energy of similar soft foams with changing fracture rate in a wide range to surprisingly find that linear elastic fracture mechanics 21,22 works well for a fixed velocity in the wide range. The velocity-dependent fracture energy is shown to be composed of a static plastoelastic component and another dynamic viscoelastic component, with the latter scaling linearly with the rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%