1981
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1981.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture mechanics in design and service: ‘living with defects’ - Fracture mechanics of non-metallic materials

Abstract: An outline of linear elastic fracture mechanics (l.e.f.m.) is given with an emphasis on those aspects most relevant to non-metallic materials. Provided that the nonlinear zone of energy absorption surrounding the crack tip is small compared with other dimensions, then a K e or G e value may be used. A simple extension of this concept can include elastically nonlinear materials such as rubber. Examples of the use of this method are then given for polymers, rubber … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both energy and force-based failure criteria have been developed for materials exhibiting brittle or quasi-brittle behaviour ( Knott 1973 ;Parton 1992 ). Primarily developed for metals, linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) has nonetheless been applied to nonmetallic materials including wood (e.g., Williams 1981 ;Patton-Mallory and Cramer 1987 ;Stanzl-Tschegg et al 1994, 1996 as well as to other plant materials ( Lucas et al 1991( Lucas et al , 1995( Lucas et al , 1997.…”
Section: Toughness In Woodmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Both energy and force-based failure criteria have been developed for materials exhibiting brittle or quasi-brittle behaviour ( Knott 1973 ;Parton 1992 ). Primarily developed for metals, linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) has nonetheless been applied to nonmetallic materials including wood (e.g., Williams 1981 ;Patton-Mallory and Cramer 1987 ;Stanzl-Tschegg et al 1994, 1996 as well as to other plant materials ( Lucas et al 1991( Lucas et al , 1995( Lucas et al , 1997.…”
Section: Toughness In Woodmentioning
confidence: 98%