Fracture load of nano-ceramic composite material for anterior endocrown restorations

Alghalayini, Salma; Ebeid, Kamal; Aldahrab, Ayman; Wahsh, Marwa

doi:10.14295/bds.2020.v23i1.1853

Cited by 5 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, most of the studies states endocrown has better fracture resistance than post and crown. [7][8][9][10]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison between endocrown fracture resistance with post core crown

Krisna¹,

Tanti²

2020

ijp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The concept of minimally invasive restoration has been more approached lately, with the aim of preserve the remaining tooth structure especially after endodotic treatment. Endocrown is one type of restoration that might be the solution. Endocrown is made of glass-ceramic material, defined as a single restoration that uses pulp chambers as a retention and resistance form, margin of preparation is above the gingiva in order to preserve tooth structure. Endocrown was initiated by Pissis in 1995 and popularized by Bindl and Mörmann in 1999. According to late research, crown endocrown has higher fracture resistance than post-core crown. Although the literature on endocrown is still limited, empirical evidence leads to positive view for the use of this restoration.

show abstract

“…However, most of the studies states endocrown has better fracture resistance than post and crown. [7][8][9][10]…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Endocrown is known as a minimally invasive type of restoration, which maintains as many healthy tooth structure as possible. 9 The success of endocrown is in the ability of adhesion of restoration material to the tooth surface. However, the use of appropriate materials can also affect the success of a restoration.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison between endocrown fracture resistance with post core crown

Krisna¹,

Tanti²

2020

ijp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The data were collected and included in table 2, the extraction of data from the included surveys was done by creating a standardized table in Excel with the following information: Author (year), Objective, Type of Study, Method, Experimental Groups, Dental Elements, Ferrule, Restoration Material, Aging. The level of scientific evidence was based on the classification of the "Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine", cited in the article by Demathé et al [16] observed in table 1. The extraction of all data was performed by the three reviewers and from the data obtained, tables were created in order to summarize the information.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Author (year), Grade of Recommendation and Level of Evidence according to the Oxford Level of Evidence[16] of the studies selected for review.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Endocrown as a restorative strategy in endodontically treated teeth: an integrative literature review

Gomes

Queiroz

Figueiredo

2022

RGO, Rev. Gaúch. Odontol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the consolidation of Adhesive Dentistry and the emergence of new aesthetic restorative materials, Endocrown has been studied as a rehabilitative option for endodontically treated teeth. This is an Integrative Literature Review, based on the PICO strategy, with articles selected from the databases of PubMed and BVS, with a period of time from 2011-2021. The database search strategy included the following keywords: (“Endocrown” OR “Endocrowns” OR “Endocrown Restoration” OR “no-post buildup” OR “adhesive endodontic crowns”). Inclusion criteria for this review were laboratory studies and observational clinical studies. Exclusion criteria were clinical case studies, literature review, systematic review and meta-analysis. Furthermore, articles that addressed only intraradicular retainers or other restorative strategies were also excluded. The selection of articles was based on abstracts. 5 articles were selected for analysis, obtaining data on the endocrown in relation to the stress on the tooth structure, aging, marginal adaptation, fracture resistance, endocrown versus conventional crown and integrity of the tooth structure. The findings in the literature are not yet established regarding the integrity of the dental structure, as the supporting evidence is limited. Only 1 in vitro article showed that dental failures in endocrowns are more favorable to repair and another 2 in silico studies show lower stress distribution on enamel, dentin and cement in the same restoration. Moreover, the restorative material seems to influence the possibility of fracture for both conventional crowns and endocrown restorations.

show abstract

“…Lise et al (Continues) higher load to failure for PCC, 2 and three studies showed no difference between groups. 4,9,10 In one study, 3 for teeth without ferule, ED led to similar endured cycles and load to failure than CC; however, CC with ferule outperformed ED without ferule.…”

Section: Data Extracted For Anterior Teethmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biomechanical performance of endocrown and core‐crown restorations: A systematic review

Lenz

Bacchi²,

Bona

2023

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo assess and compare, through a systematic review of the literature, the biomechanical performance of endocrowns and traditional core‐crowns (with and without intracanal post) for the rehabilitation of endodontically treated teeth with severe coronal structure damage.Materials and MethodsA systematic search was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. In‐vitro studies comparing endocrowns with (post‐)core‐crown restorations were selected and screened by two independent reviewers. The included studies were submitted to the risk of bias analysis using the RoBDEMAT tool and the biomechanical outcomes were collected for qualitative analysis. The extracted data were presented based on comparative analyses among the included studies.ResultsThirty‐one studies were included: 9 studies evaluated restorations of molars, 14 for premolars, and 8 studies evaluated anterior restorations. For the majority of the studies, endocrowns showed either similar or greater survival rates under fatigue and monotonic load than (post‐)core‐crown restorations, irrespectively of the tooth. The endocrowns showed more favorable failure patterns than (post‐)core‐crowns, irrespectively of the tooth. Endocrowns produced lower stresses in the restorative material for molars and premolars and in the luting material for premolars than (post‐)core‐crown restorations. The included studies presented adequate information for most items of the RoBDEMAT risk of bias tool.ConclusionEndocrowns showed similar or greater biomechanical performance than the traditional (post‐)core‐crown restorations in most of the evaluated studies.Clinical SignificanceThis systematic review showed that endocrowns present either similar or greater biomechanical performance than core‐crown restorations for anterior and posterior endodontically treated teeth with severe structural damage.

show abstract

Fracture load of nano-ceramic composite material for anterior endocrown restorations

Cited by 5 publications

References 21 publications

Comparison between endocrown fracture resistance with post core crown

Comparison between endocrown fracture resistance with post core crown

Endocrown as a restorative strategy in endodontically treated teeth: an integrative literature review

Biomechanical performance of endocrown and core‐crown restorations: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About