2013
DOI: 10.1097/id.0b013e318278a576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture Load of Monolithic CAD/CAM Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns and Veneered Zirconia Crowns as a Posterior Implant Restoration

Abstract: Monolithic CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns are applicable to posterior implant-supported restorations because the fracture load was higher than the average occlusal force.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
38
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As the blocks are formed in an immediate phase due to partial crystallisation, they are easier to machine and can obtain high strength. 38 Combined with aesthetic concerns, CAD/CAM lithium disilicate monolithic crowns could be used for single crown restoration in the anterior and posterior regions. 39 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the blocks are formed in an immediate phase due to partial crystallisation, they are easier to machine and can obtain high strength. 38 Combined with aesthetic concerns, CAD/CAM lithium disilicate monolithic crowns could be used for single crown restoration in the anterior and posterior regions. 39 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival rate was 97.4% after 5 years and 94.8% after 8 years of clinical service; among the technical complications, 3 crowns resulted affected by minor chipping. The study revealed that the survival rate was not influenced by cementation type (conventional versus adhesive) or by crown location (anterior versus posterior); on the other hand, in vitro researches have clearly demonstrated that lithium disilicate can bear high stress conditions, like in posterior crowns [64, 65]. Esquivel-Upshaw et al [66] conducted a 3-year clinical study comparing the performance of veneered lithium disilicate (Empress 2), monolithic lithium disilicate (e-Max Press, glazed), and metal-ceramic crowns (IPS d.SIGN veneer); they observed similar, highly positive results, although a higher degree of surface roughening was detected in the veneered lithium disilicate-based crowns, compared to metal-ceramics, between years 2 and 3.…”
Section: Clinical Indications and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, monolithic zirconia prostheses have been proposed where the prosthesis is entirely fabricated from zirconia. Such treatment modality appears to be promising for tooth-supported prostheses [71] and implant-supported prostheses [72]. This appears to be coming from a more popular option especially with the increased application of stained or translucent zirconia that overcomes the problem of high value of zirconia [73, 74].…”
Section: Computer-aided Production Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%