1997
DOI: 10.2514/3.13503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture criterion for notched thin composite laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the measurement of the intralaminar fracture toughnesses for fiber tensile failure, the compact tension (CT) specimen, originally developed for the fracture toughness characterization in metals [11,12], is commonly used [13, 14,15,16,17,18,19]. In contrast to the centre-notched (CN) [20,21,22,23,24,25,26], the 10 double-edge notched (DEN) [27,28,29] and the four-point bending (4PB) [27] specimens, the CT specimen shows a stable crack propagation, which enables the determination of the R-curve. Unfortunately, the CT specimen has several limitations: i) the tendency of buckling/twisting at the back side (because of the reduced thickness of the specimen [30] or because of the high load that occurs 15 especially when testing high toughened material systems [31]); ii) failure at the back side (because the compressive stress reaches the compressive strength of the material); and iii) failure at the load introduction point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the measurement of the intralaminar fracture toughnesses for fiber tensile failure, the compact tension (CT) specimen, originally developed for the fracture toughness characterization in metals [11,12], is commonly used [13, 14,15,16,17,18,19]. In contrast to the centre-notched (CN) [20,21,22,23,24,25,26], the 10 double-edge notched (DEN) [27,28,29] and the four-point bending (4PB) [27] specimens, the CT specimen shows a stable crack propagation, which enables the determination of the R-curve. Unfortunately, the CT specimen has several limitations: i) the tendency of buckling/twisting at the back side (because of the reduced thickness of the specimen [30] or because of the high load that occurs 15 especially when testing high toughened material systems [31]); ii) failure at the back side (because the compressive stress reaches the compressive strength of the material); and iii) failure at the load introduction point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 The calculated value of mode-II fracture energy G IIc is lower than the measured value of 0.51 kJ/m 251 for the same crack configuration, but close to the value of 0.150 kJ/m 2 that was evaluated on the basis of the splitting growth in cross-ply laminates. 52 Off-axis apparent equivalent mode-I fracture toughness…”
Section: Off-axis Intrinsic Equivalent Mode-i Fracture Toughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These architectures are described in the text by [1]. Failure criteria for strength prediction can be roughly divided into three categories; stress or strain based criteria, [2][3][4], energy based criteria, [5][6][7][8] and a combination of stress and energy criteria, [9][10][11][12][13]. The challenge to the classical stress based criteria occurs from structural configurations that fail in the presence of stress gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%