2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fracture and progressive failure of defective graphene sheets and carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
60
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the shear modulus and Poisson’s ration of defective graphene sheet are closely related to the position of SVs, and a pronounced reduction is observed when SVs are in a region of large strain gradient. Another atomistic FEA study [292] indicates that increasing the density of SW defects in graphene can change the Young’s modulus dramatically, particularly when the distance between neighboring defects is smaller than 2 nm (diameter of interaction region of SW defects [293]). Besides, the presence of single SW defects can result in significant reduction of the ultimate strength for graphene sheet, and further strength reductions are predicted for cases where adjacent SW defects are interacting with each other.…”
Section: Disorders In Graphene Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the shear modulus and Poisson’s ration of defective graphene sheet are closely related to the position of SVs, and a pronounced reduction is observed when SVs are in a region of large strain gradient. Another atomistic FEA study [292] indicates that increasing the density of SW defects in graphene can change the Young’s modulus dramatically, particularly when the distance between neighboring defects is smaller than 2 nm (diameter of interaction region of SW defects [293]). Besides, the presence of single SW defects can result in significant reduction of the ultimate strength for graphene sheet, and further strength reductions are predicted for cases where adjacent SW defects are interacting with each other.…”
Section: Disorders In Graphene Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a higher misorientation angle yields a higher density of dislocation cores at the linear tilt boundary, but also to higher intrinsic strength of the model structures, the authors noted that their results disagree with the fracture me-chanics model, assuming the heptagons of the dislocation cores correspond to Griffith cracks, which would predict graphene sheets to become weaker with an increasing defect density. If the grain boundaries themselves are indeed the weakest point in the lattice, this can be argued to be a reasonable comparison since also Stone-Wales defect consists of pentagons and heptagons and it has been shown to weaken graphene [12]. However, despite similarities between the theoretical models [16,17] and short segments of the actually observed non-decorated boundaries [1][2][3][4][5], it remains unclear whether such infinitely long linear arrangements of dislocation cores can serve as a realistic model for studying mechanical properties of polycrystalline graphene.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational work has investigated the mechanical properties of graphene in the presence of vacancies [27][28][29][30][31] , bond reconstruction [32][33][34][35] and functional groups 36 . Several studies have also shown the formation and structural evolution of defects in graphene using both experimental 37,38 and theoretical tools [39][40][41][42] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%