2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11368-013-0654-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractions of Cu, Cd, and enzyme activities in a contaminated soil as affected by applications of micro- and nanohydroxyapatite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 shows that the H4 treatment level increased soil pH the most among all amendments, increasing soil pH by 2.34 units compared to the control. This result corresponds with the results of Cui [8], who reported that supplemental hydroxyapatite can enhance soil pH, and that the incremental increase is consistent with the amount of hydroxyapatite added. Treatment N4 also experienced an increase in soil pH, by 1.38 units.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 shows that the H4 treatment level increased soil pH the most among all amendments, increasing soil pH by 2.34 units compared to the control. This result corresponds with the results of Cui [8], who reported that supplemental hydroxyapatite can enhance soil pH, and that the incremental increase is consistent with the amount of hydroxyapatite added. Treatment N4 also experienced an increase in soil pH, by 1.38 units.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Many natural materials such as limestone, zeolite, hydroxyapatite, sepiolite, palyorskite, and red mud have been reported to effectively remediate soil contaminated with heavy metals [6][7][8][9][10]. Among these amendments, hydroxyapatite is considered one of the most effective natural materials in immobilizing heavy metals in soil [11,12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The enzymatic activity of soil is considered the most important indicator allowing monitoring of the effect of farming, agricultural practices, and the presence of contaminants on the soil condition (Oleszczuk et al, 2014). Enzymatic activity also reflects the indirect capability of contaminated soil of self-purification (Cui et al, 2013). Currently, there are several mechanisms known that can explain the increase in the enzymatic activity of soil fertilised with biochar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of potentially toxic heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in biochar as well as its usually strong alkaline reaction can pose a serious threat to the soil quality and its biological life in particular. Studies of Cui et al (2013) and Yang et al (2016) clearly show that there is a close correlation between the concentration of heavy metals, pH, and enzymatic activity of soil. Also research of Wu et al (2013) and our previous study indicated that the use of biochar obtained from various feedstocks may have different effects on enzymatic activity and ecotoxicity of soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%