2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractionation sensitivity and dose response of late adverse effects in the breast after radiotherapy for early breast cancer: long-term results of a randomised trial

Abstract: Background and purpose: Unlike squamous carcinomas, breast adenocarcinoma may be as sensitive to fraction size as late dose-limiting normal tissues. If so, fewer larger fractions would be as safe and effective as regimens based on 2.0 Gy fractions. The first step is to test the effects of radiotherapy fractions O2.0 Gy on late normal tissue responses in the breast after tumour excision and radiotherapy for early breast cancer.Patients and methods: One thousand four-hundred and ten women with T1-3 N0-1 M0 invas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
318
0
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 457 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
16
318
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Least square fitting resulted in new parameters for the AAA, the Acuros‐M, and the Acuros‐W algorithms (Table 4). The relative seriality of the breast, s=0.12, (28) and α/β=3Gy (26) were kept fixed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Least square fitting resulted in new parameters for the AAA, the Acuros‐M, and the Acuros‐W algorithms (Table 4). The relative seriality of the breast, s=0.12, (28) and α/β=3Gy (26) were kept fixed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, first the BED method (22) was applied with α/β=3Gy (26) . Next, the NTCP was calculated using the relative seriality model for inhomogeneous dose distributions (27) using Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This endpoint has been well established and validated in randomised clinical trials, indicating it to be sensitive to small (<10%) differences in randomised total dose [1][2][3]7,11]. The 2-year timepoint is predictive of the relative effects of randomised groups at longer follow up, even though the absolute rate of adverse effects continues to rise for at least a decade and probably for life [7,22,23]. The limiting factor is not, therefore, the 2-year timepoint, but the total number of adverse events available for analysis, and particularly when stratified by treatment schedule.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiotherapy and Oncology 104 (2012) 143-147 The routine use of hypofractionation in breast radiotherapy is supported by outcome data of four large randomised clinical trials in women with early breast cancer [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Residual concerns include the impact of dose inhomogeneity on the risk of adverse effects after hypofractionated schedules, so-called 'treble trouble' [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results from the START-pilot trial [24] were used to independently assess the goodness of fit of the predicted NTCP models. The START-pilot trial randomised 1410 patients into one of three whole breast RT dose fractionations: 50 Gy in 25 fractions or 39 Gy in 13 fractions or 42.9 Gy in 13 fractions.…”
Section: Goodness Of Fit Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%