1981
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(81)90080-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractionation of phasic responses in a dishabituation paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If only novelty changes are involved, both respiratory pause and EDA may be used to index habituation of the OR, but their common variance is reduced if other independent variables are included in the manipulation. This lack of covariation confirms previous findings from this laboratory, and is supportive of a proposed fractionation of the OR (Barry, 1979;Barry & James, 1981) rather than the unitary OR of Sokolov (1963).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If only novelty changes are involved, both respiratory pause and EDA may be used to index habituation of the OR, but their common variance is reduced if other independent variables are included in the manipulation. This lack of covariation confirms previous findings from this laboratory, and is supportive of a proposed fractionation of the OR (Barry, 1979;Barry & James, 1981) rather than the unitary OR of Sokolov (1963).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This variable was included because recent work upon the unitary OR concept in this laboratory (e.g., Barry & James, 1981) had indicated that SRR and respiratory pause failed to covary across a range of stimulus parameters, supporting aspects of an alternative concept of preliminary processes in OR elicitation (Barry, 1979).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the autonomic variables provide some interesting effects. The evoked cardiac response in this study was a simple deceleratory ECR1, as expected in the absence of stimulus significance (Barry, 1977a;Barry and James, 1981a). This did not show any decrement with stimulus repetition, reflecting its expected response profile in PPT as an index of stimulus registration, an early stage of stimulus processing (Barry, 2006(Barry, , 2009.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of these different stimulus-response relationships (e.g., Barry and James, 1981a) led Barry to propose an alternative sequential-processing model of OR elicitation and habituation. This was subsequently developed as 'Preliminary Process Theory' (PPT) (see Barry, 1987aBarry, ,b, 1996Barry, , 2006Barry, , 2009.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Research has shown that this early deceleratory ECR1 is independent from stimulus parameters (e.g. novelty, intensity) (Barry, 1977;Barry and James, 1981), and as such, has been linked with CNS responses including stimulus detection/registration (Barry, 1987(Barry, , 2009, and the transient inhibition of competing responses ). An additional observation arising from this research has been that requiring a response to a stimulus results in a second phasic cardiac response component of HR acceleration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%