2003
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractionation of oligosaccharides by nanofiltration

Abstract: Two loose nanofiltration membranes (NF-CA-50 and NF-TFC-50) and one dense ultrafiltration membrane (UF-CA-1) were used to fractionate commercial oligosaccharide mixtures by applying diafiltration in a 'dead-end' filtration cell at 40 bar constant pressure with a maximum volume concentration ratio (VCR) of 6 at each fractionation. The rejections of a monosaccharide (glucose) and a disaccharide (lactose) were determined for each membrane; the results indicated that fractionation between these two sugars was poss… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, using the rejection fraction instead of concentrations, a relationship between observed rejection (R obs ) and real rejection (R real ) can be expressed as: (14) where R obs is defined as (15) Pruksasri et al Page 7 In a cross flow system, the mass transfer coefficient (k m ) can be calculated with the equation: (16) where Sh is the Sherwood number, Re the Reynolds number, Sc the Schmidt number, d h the hydraulic diameter and D the diffusion coefficient. The factors α i are filtration system related factors.…”
Section: Some Qualitative Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, using the rejection fraction instead of concentrations, a relationship between observed rejection (R obs ) and real rejection (R real ) can be expressed as: (14) where R obs is defined as (15) Pruksasri et al Page 7 In a cross flow system, the mass transfer coefficient (k m ) can be calculated with the equation: (16) where Sh is the Sherwood number, Re the Reynolds number, Sc the Schmidt number, d h the hydraulic diameter and D the diffusion coefficient. The factors α i are filtration system related factors.…”
Section: Some Qualitative Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, commercial GOS products are produced by the enzymatic reaction of concentrated lactose solutions at 200-400 g/L with β-galactosidase from different sources. Several purification techniques have been investigated such as precipitation by ethanol [9], adsorption by activated charcoal [10][11][12], separation by ion exchange chromatography [13] and membrane fractionation [14][15][16][17][18][19]. Nanofiltration is of particular interest because of its selectivity properties for the present application, thus, some studies have already been published [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanofiltration membranes can be used for purifying galactooligosaccharides (GOS) products from the monosaccharide hydrolysis products, glucose and galactose. According to Gosling et al, (2010), up to 88% of the di-and oligosaccharides were recovered from a commercial GOS mixture using a nanofiltration membrane with only 19% of the monosaccharides remaining in the retentate stream (Goulas et al, 2003). Catarino et al, (2008) investigated the fractionation of saccharide mixtures with calcium using ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes and reported that saccharide fractionation was enhanced in the presence of calcium.…”
Section: Oligosaccharidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility for ensuring protection of purified enzyme is offered by using membrane processes (Curcio et al, 2006). Therefore, an UF system in combination with a hydrolysis reactor might be preferred due to enzyme separation via the membrane (Goulas et al, 2003, Novain et al, 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%