2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy as Reirradiation for Locally Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
120
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(22 reference statements)
4
120
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Stereotactic irradiation generally allows hypofractionation (doses of 2.5 Gy or more) because of the small volume of the treated tumor and the accurate delivery of irradiation. Hypofractionated stereotactic body RT has shown encouraging 2-year overall survival rates of 14% to 41% in the reirradiation setting, [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and this approach is being increasingly investigated as a boost of prophylactic volumes after IMRT. Data for proton therapy in rare radioresistant head and neck cancer has shown high local control rates of 78% to 85% at 5 years with less than 5% severe late toxicity.…”
Section: Chemoradiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stereotactic irradiation generally allows hypofractionation (doses of 2.5 Gy or more) because of the small volume of the treated tumor and the accurate delivery of irradiation. Hypofractionated stereotactic body RT has shown encouraging 2-year overall survival rates of 14% to 41% in the reirradiation setting, [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and this approach is being increasingly investigated as a boost of prophylactic volumes after IMRT. Data for proton therapy in rare radioresistant head and neck cancer has shown high local control rates of 78% to 85% at 5 years with less than 5% severe late toxicity.…”
Section: Chemoradiation Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review highlights the possible potential of BNCT in the management of patients with LRHNC, but BNCT should be compared against other emerging local re-irradiation therapeutic options for patients with LRHNC -Stereotactic Radiosurgery (Roh et al, 2009), IMRT (Lee et al, 2007) or Proton Therapy (Stuschke et al, 2013). While the availability of BNCT facilities remains limited, it has been estimated that accelerator-based BNCT facilities can be installed in hospitals at a similar cost to that of presently used for standard radiotherapy (Blue and Yanch, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roh et al 51 ). Treatment sites included the nasopharynx (8 patients), maxillary sinus (8 patients), cervical lymph nodes (8 patients), skull base (7 patients), nasal cavity (4 patients), retropharyngeal lymph nodes (3 patients), orbit (2 patients), tongue (2 patients), oropharynx (1 patient), and parotid gland (1 patient).…”
Section: Salvage Options For Recurrent Hncmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positron emission tomography fused with CT improves the visualization of the tumor extent. 12,[33][34][35]51 Additional information from MR imaging can also improve target volume definition, 27,48 especially in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer and skull-based tumors. 24 After defining the GTV, a clinical target volume may be defined to account for potential subclinical disease and a PTV margin to account for treatment setup.…”
Section: Defining the Target Volumementioning
confidence: 99%