Fractionated single-particle states ofS33atEx

Evolution of single-particle structure near the N=20 island of inversion

“…Comparisons are made below with previous (d,p) crosssection data leading to 31 Si [32] and 33 S [33,34] and a consistent methodology was used, employing the same DWBA modeling and normalization method. Some variation in values of the normalization between different data sets was noted.…”

“…Vacancies deduced from summed single-particle strength for the s 1/2 , p, d, and f 7/2 orbitals are given in Table II for 29 Mg, compared with 31 Si [32] and 33 S [33,34]. The vacancies for the two p orbitals were combined to avoid issues with j assignments for some = 1 states, but unassigned = 2 strength was taken to be d 3/2 and unassigned = 3 strength above 7 MeV was assumed to be f 5/2 .…”

“…31 Si and 33 S are from Refs. [32][33][34]. Bands represent calculations using the FSU interaction, with widths representing experimental uncertainties in 31 Si, onto which they are shifted.…”

“…Centroids for J π = 1/2 − and 3/2 − , including states above 5.5 MeV, are denoted by . Data for31 Si and33 S are from Refs [32][33][34]…”