2017
DOI: 10.12693/aphyspola.131.633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional Scaling of Magnetic Coercivity in Electrical Steels

Abstract: The paper presents an application of the fractional scaling procedure in the analysis of magnetic coercivity. The frequency and excitation dependences of measured coercivity can be expressed in a single curve using properly scaled coercivity and frequency values. The scaling parameters will be presented for three different electrical steels.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented results indicate that the phenomenon of energy dissipation in Somaloy-type composites confirms its scaling behaviour. In contrast to soft magnetic alloys analyzed in previous papers (Gozdur and Najgebauer, 2015; Najgebauer, 2015; Najgebauer, 2017), the scaling analysis of specific power loss in magnetic composites provides better results for the two-component formulae, which are similar to the theoretical formula resulting from the Poynting theorem, than for the simplified formula – typical for an engineering approach. Thus, only two-component formulae (2) and (3) are investigated in further considerations.…”
Section: Numerical Computations and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presented results indicate that the phenomenon of energy dissipation in Somaloy-type composites confirms its scaling behaviour. In contrast to soft magnetic alloys analyzed in previous papers (Gozdur and Najgebauer, 2015; Najgebauer, 2015; Najgebauer, 2017), the scaling analysis of specific power loss in magnetic composites provides better results for the two-component formulae, which are similar to the theoretical formula resulting from the Poynting theorem, than for the simplified formula – typical for an engineering approach. Thus, only two-component formulae (2) and (3) are investigated in further considerations.…”
Section: Numerical Computations and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The use of formulae (3) and (4) yielded comparable results of the power loss scaling. Because of the lower number of coefficients, formula (4) was then applied in investigations concerning the analysis and modelling of the specific power loss in amorphous, nanocrystalline and magnetocaloric alloys (Gozdur and Najgebauer, 2015; Najgebauer, 2017), providing satisfactory results. The use of a scaling algorithm with fractional exponents has also significantly improved the scaling of magnetic coercivity (Najgebauer, 2017).…”
Section: Scaling Algorithms In Analysis Of Power Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, magnetic losses in these composites will be analyzed using the scaling theory. The scaling theory has been previously applied in the magnetic losses analyzed for electrical steels, amorphous and nanocrystalline ribbons as well as magnetocaloric alloys [13][14][15], which provided interesting and useful results. The losses scaling should allow us to investigate multiscale behaviour of energy dissipation in Fe-polymer composites; to find universal relations between parameters; and finally to model magnetic composites for different Fe-grain size, excitation conditions or technological parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaling analysis is also used in materials science, including the study of magnetic material properties such as power loss [30][31][32][33][34], coercivity [35][36][37], magnetic viscosity [38][39][40] or hysteresis loops [41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Scaling Analysis Of Magnetic Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous studies, a scaling function was usually represented by Maclaurin series [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Scaling Analysis Of Magnetic Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%