2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-11969-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional probabilistic fuzzy clustering and optimization based brain tumor segmentation and classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Table 5 demonstrates the analysis of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the proposed IALO with RNN method and exisiting brain tumor classification methods. The sensitivity score obtained by most recent methods like Deep RNN with fractional CSO [22], Whale-Cat Swarm optimization based Deep belief network [13], Deep CNN with Dolphin-SCA [29], and hybrid method proposed by [47] are 95%, 95%, 97.7%, 97.34% respectively. However the sensitivity of proposed method is high 99.23% for BRATS dataset, 99% for J.Cheng dataset CNN with Dolphin-SCA [29], and hybrid method proposed by Bansal and Jindal [47] are 96%, 96%, 95.3%, and 98.82% respectively.…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, Table 5 demonstrates the analysis of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the proposed IALO with RNN method and exisiting brain tumor classification methods. The sensitivity score obtained by most recent methods like Deep RNN with fractional CSO [22], Whale-Cat Swarm optimization based Deep belief network [13], Deep CNN with Dolphin-SCA [29], and hybrid method proposed by [47] are 95%, 95%, 97.7%, 97.34% respectively. However the sensitivity of proposed method is high 99.23% for BRATS dataset, 99% for J.Cheng dataset CNN with Dolphin-SCA [29], and hybrid method proposed by Bansal and Jindal [47] are 96%, 96%, 95.3%, and 98.82% respectively.…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method selects the optimum features based on solving the optimization problem by IALO algorithm which yields the higher specificity than the existing method. As compared to existing methods such as, Whale-Cat optimization [13], Hybrid fuzzy brain-storm optimization [23], Deep CNN with Dolphin-SCA [29], Deep RNN with fractional-CSO [22], hybrid method proposed by Bansal and Jindal [47] yield the accuracy as Fig. 16 Convergence curve for J.Cheng dataset using SVM 92.75%, 93.85%, 95.3%, 93.35%, 98.75% and IALO with RNN has a higher accuracy (99.59% for BRATS, 99.18% for J.Cheng dataset).…”
Section: Performance Analysis Of Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These features are often combined with machine learning algorithms such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, etc. Jemimma et al [20] used fractional probability fuzzy C-means (FRF-PFCM) for automated segmentation of brain glioma MRI data, followed by feature extraction using descriptors, empirical mode decomposition (EMD), local direction pattern (LDP), wavelet transform, etc. The resultant feature set was then input into a deep belief network based on whale cat swarm optimization (WCSO-DBN) for classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when dealing with noise or outliers in the data, FCM efficacy is only partial. 20 Another crucial factor is that the FCM's results are affected by the starting values of the parameters. In their work on possibilistic CM (PCM) clustering, Ramakrishnan et al and Zhang et al 21,22 suggested a new method called PCM.…”
Section: R E T R a C T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%