Fractional Order PID and Modulated Hysteresis for high performance current control in multilevel inverters

Rasoanarivo, Ignace; Tehrani, Kambiz; Sargos, F.M.

doi:10.1109/ias.2011.6074351

Cited by 17 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some major control strategies which have applied the power electronic systems in past decades are hysteresis control, adaptive fuzzy logic control, PI control, model predictive control (MPC), robust control and so on. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] In most of the research studies, [29][30][31][32][33][34] PI and PID controllers are implemented to control the three-phase PWM VSI for the reason that PI and PID controllers are simple and convenient and widely implemented in industrial applications. In recent times, with the development of computer technology, and many advantages of FO controls, the use of the generalized form of PI and PID controllers which are FOPI and FOPID is becoming widespread instead of the classical PI and PID controllers.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various researches in practical systems indicate that FO controllers perform better related to transient response and robustness. [32][33][34] Voltage controller is used to controlling the threephase inverter system in this research as presented in Figure 2 and the main purpose of this controller is to generate and dispatch voltage to the smart building. In this paper, PI, PID, FOPID and FOPI controllers are implemented in the voltage control loop.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various researches in practical systems indicate that FO controllers perform better related to transient response and robustness. 32–34…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Application of fractional-order voltage controller in building-integrated photovoltaic and wind turbine system

Gül

Tan

2019

Measurement and Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The share of electricity generation based on clean, inexhaustible and continuous energy sources, such as solar and wind, in total energy production, is rising day by day due to its significant advantages such as having the less negative impact on global climate and environmental pollution and not requiring fuel for energy production. It is reported that commercial and residential buildings correspond to about 20.1% of the world energy consumption, so it is necessary to provide energy needs of buildings with hybrid renewable energy systems. When using non-continuous energy sources such as solar panel and wind turbines, it is important to ensure ensuring a stable and quality power flow to the building while the power demands of building show very sharp variability. This work presents a voltage control system using fractional-order operators in the smart residential building-integrated hybrid renewable power plant (solar + wind). In this research article, fractional-order proportional–integral/proportional–integral–derivative controllers are proposed on a synchronous frame for a pulse-width modulation based three-phase voltage source inverter in residential building-integrated solar panel and wind turbines system (building-integrated photovoltaic/wind turbine system) in order to improve the quality of injected voltage to building. When comparing the effect of closed-loop voltage control system with integer order controllers (proportional–integral and proportional–integral–derivative) on the power quality at the building distribution by analyzing the simulation results for proposed case study, use of fractional-order voltage controllers for nonlinear system such as building integrated with hybrid renewable sources is more suitable than using integer order voltage controllers.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Application of fractional-order voltage controller in building-integrated photovoltaic and wind turbine system

Gül

Tan

2019

Measurement and Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the converters need a control system. These converters are controlled by using classical and advanced control methods such as P, PI, PD, and PID controllers [5]; fuzzy logic controllers [6], fractional PID [7]; artificial neural networks [8]; vector control methods [9]; model predictive control [10]; and genetic algorithms [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Performance of Photovoltaic Power Generation-Consumption System with Push-Pull Converter under the Effect of Five Different Types of Controllers

Zenk

2019

International Journal of Photoenergy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, a dynamic system has been modeled to efficiently use a photovoltaic generation and control system (PVGCS) for driving of a medium power off-grid electric machine. The measures have been taken to respond to three different disturbing factors in this system. First, the photovoltaic panels selected for energy generation have a variable solar radiation effect. Second, the DC motor load at the system output is assumed to have a variable torque. Third, a variable reference voltage, which is determined even in the case of time-varying energy generation and consumption of the system, is followed with minimum error. For this purpose, a push-pull converter has been chosen as a highly flexible structure since it is predicted that it can provide stable and effective variable DC voltage at increasing and decreasing level required for DC motor. The control of the DC voltage at different levels to be provided by the push-pull converter is performed by PI, fuzzy logic, fuzzy-tuned PI, 2-DOF PI, and fractional PID logic whose coefficients are selected by appropriate methods, respectively. The system efficiency and stability under the influence of these five different advanced controllers are compared. In the case of two disturbing factors affecting the system, the difference values (errors) of the voltage generated by each selected controller with the reference voltage are determined comparatively. The studies were carried out by using dynamic system modeling in MATLAB-SIMULINK software. In addition, the results of this study proved which type of controllers is more successful in controlling systems with the second order and more instability factors and which of them responds to sudden changes in errors more quickly.

show abstract

“…Current source, voltage source, impedance source, quasi impedance source inverters, and multilevel inverters are commonly used [13]. These inverters are controlled by using classical and advanced control methods such as a PID controller [14], fuzzy logic controllers [15], fractional PID [16], artificial neural networks [17], vector control methods [18], model predictive control [19], and genetic algorithms [20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Five-Level H-Bridge STATCOM for an Off-Grid PV Solar Farm under Two Controllers PI and PI^λ-MPC Hybrid

Mengi

2018

International Journal of Photoenergy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigations were presented in order to eliminate the reactive power on microgrid loads fed by an off-grid and mid-power photovoltaic solar energy system (PVSES) with a static synchronous compensator (STATCOM) device. The electric network is specifically characterized by P-Q loads, ambient temperature, and widely variable solar radiation levels. Two main innovations are developed. Firstly, the STATCOM apparatus is a 5-level H-bridge inverter with capacitances as load and must totally compensates the reactive power in the network load. Secondly, this compensation is controlled by a set of fractional PI (PI λ ) and model predictive control (MPC) hybrid. The efficiencies of these controllers were compared with classical PI controllers. Large simulations, without and with reactive power compensation, in steady and transient states, are carried out to underline the merits of the presented works, by performing in the MATLAB-Simulink environment.

show abstract

Fractional Order PID and Modulated Hysteresis for high performance current control in multilevel inverters

Cited by 17 publications

References 30 publications

Application of fractional-order voltage controller in building-integrated photovoltaic and wind turbine system

Application of fractional-order voltage controller in building-integrated photovoltaic and wind turbine system

Comparison of the Performance of Photovoltaic Power Generation-Consumption System with Push-Pull Converter under the Effect of Five Different Types of Controllers

A Five-Level H-Bridge STATCOM for an Off-Grid PV Solar Farm under Two Controllers PI and PI^λ-MPC Hybrid

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Fractional Order PID and Modulated Hysteresis for high performance current control in multilevel inverters

Cited by 17 publications

References 30 publications

Application of fractional-order voltage controller in building-integrated photovoltaic and wind turbine system

Application of fractional-order voltage controller in building-integrated photovoltaic and wind turbine system

Comparison of the Performance of Photovoltaic Power Generation-Consumption System with Push-Pull Converter under the Effect of Five Different Types of Controllers

A Five-Level H-Bridge STATCOM for an Off-Grid PV Solar Farm under Two Controllers PI and PIλ-MPC Hybrid

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

A Five-Level H-Bridge STATCOM for an Off-Grid PV Solar Farm under Two Controllers PI and PI^λ-MPC Hybrid