2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marchem.2015.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional iron solubility of atmospheric iron inputs to the Southern Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(161 reference statements)
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ATARS provides an ideal location to further investigate BB-derived fractional iron solubility at the source. The results from this study can be found in Winton et al (2016) and show that soluble iron concentrations from BB sources are significantly higher than those observed in Southern Ocean baseline air masses from the Cape Grim Baseline Air Pollution Station, Tasmania, Australia (Winton et al, 2015). Aerosol iron at SAFIRED was a mixture of fresh BB, mineral dust, sea spray and industrial pollution sources.…”
Section: Biomass Burning Aerosol Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…ATARS provides an ideal location to further investigate BB-derived fractional iron solubility at the source. The results from this study can be found in Winton et al (2016) and show that soluble iron concentrations from BB sources are significantly higher than those observed in Southern Ocean baseline air masses from the Cape Grim Baseline Air Pollution Station, Tasmania, Australia (Winton et al, 2015). Aerosol iron at SAFIRED was a mixture of fresh BB, mineral dust, sea spray and industrial pollution sources.…”
Section: Biomass Burning Aerosol Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although in the literature there are recent estimates of trace metals solubility from dust (e.g., Chance et al, ; López‐García et al, ; Mackey et al, ; Ravelo‐Pérez et al, ; Winton et al, ), solubility percentages are usually as variable as reported values of atmospheric dust deposition in the ocean. The reasons for such variability include the origin, load, and geochemical characteristics of dust (Baker et al, ; Jickells et al, ; Sholkovitz et al, ) as well as a lack of consensus among the methodologies used for its estimation (Meskhidze et al, ; Raiswell et al, ; Schulz et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human activity on this scale increases dust emissions in many environments (Brown et al, ; Ginoux et al, ; McConnell et al, ; Mulitza et al, ; Neff et al, ; Stanelle et al, ), and thus iron emissions, as mineral dust contains ~3.5% iron by mass (Jickells et al, ; Shi et al, ). While dust is the dominant (>90%) source of total aerosol bearing iron to the open ocean (Mahowald et al, ), a secondary source of iron comes from pyrogenic sources, including vegetation fires (Guieu et al, ; Ito, ; Paris et al, ; Winton et al, ), industrial and domestic combustion (Chen et al, ; Chuang et al, ; Luo et al, ; Myriokefalitakis et al, ), and shipping emissions (Ito, ). However, significant differences exist in the particle size distribution and oxidation state of iron between dust and pyrogenic sources, and thus the soluble iron fraction also differs (i.e., the ratio of water leachable iron to total iron, often considered the bioavailable fraction) (Baker & Croot, ; Schroth et al, ; Shi et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%