2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2855147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractional Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average and Finite-Element Modal: The Forecast of Tire Vibration Trend

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modal Assurance Criterion. e modal analysis theory is adapted to analyze and evaluate intrinsic dynamic properties of the mechanical structure, and it also serves as the premise of vibration analysis [18].…”
Section: Research Methodology Of the Proposed Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modal Assurance Criterion. e modal analysis theory is adapted to analyze and evaluate intrinsic dynamic properties of the mechanical structure, and it also serves as the premise of vibration analysis [18].…”
Section: Research Methodology Of the Proposed Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have used a differencing function to remove the trends and stabilize the mean of equation 8. Differencing is a popular method to make the time series stationary [19], [65].…”
Section: A Autoregressive Integrated Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, since the NF of a tooth can be affected by several factors, this kind of method is infeasible to analyze the effect of these individual factors on the estimated NF [12]. Computational method normally uses finite element method (FEM) [13]- [15] and has advantages to simulate free vibration of structure, complex geometric shapes, material properties, and different periodontal conditions, which are difficult to replicate in in vivo or in vitro experiments. The FEM has been extensively applied to analyze the NFs of teeth [1], [2], [4], [5], different periodontal conditions' effect on NFs [1], [3], [16], and NF values of implants for stability evaluation [12], [17]- [22].…”
Section: Compared To the Traditional Radiographic Evaluation Formentioning
confidence: 99%