2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004gl021779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal reconnection structures on the magnetopause

Abstract: [1] Simple laminar flow models of the magnetosheath plasma lead to predictions of large-scale reconnection structures on the dayside magnetopause. There is observational evidence from the ionosphere that such structures exist. However, in situ observations of the magnetosheath plasma near the magnetopause indicate that the fluid is highly disordered, with the magnetic field orientation in particular being extremely noisy. This raises the question of how coherent large-scale reconnection structures can be creat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the development of the remote sensing technique and the existing and forthcoming data from SuperDARN and auroral imagers, measurement of reconnection could become increasingly efficient and routine. This should allow us to address more conclusively the particularly important problem of the general structure of reconnection in time and space, including its temporal continuity and stability [ Phan et al , 2000; Abel and Freeman , 2002], and the relative prevalence and causes of single, dual, or multiple reconnection sites with particular scales, or of scale‐free reconnection structure [ Lazarian and Vishniac , 1999; Klimas et al , 2000; Coleman et al , 2001; Chisham et al , 2002; Coleman and Freeman , 2005; Phan et al , 2006].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of the remote sensing technique and the existing and forthcoming data from SuperDARN and auroral imagers, measurement of reconnection could become increasingly efficient and routine. This should allow us to address more conclusively the particularly important problem of the general structure of reconnection in time and space, including its temporal continuity and stability [ Phan et al , 2000; Abel and Freeman , 2002], and the relative prevalence and causes of single, dual, or multiple reconnection sites with particular scales, or of scale‐free reconnection structure [ Lazarian and Vishniac , 1999; Klimas et al , 2000; Coleman et al , 2001; Chisham et al , 2002; Coleman and Freeman , 2005; Phan et al , 2006].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abel and Freeman (2002) argued that the functional form of these occurrence distributions was a power law, implying that there is no preferred timescale for these convection velocity fluctuations. They proposed that this scale-free nature could arise from the intermittent, turbulent nature of the IMF causing magnetic reconnection to occur at the magnetopause across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales (Coleman and Freeman 2005). SuperDARN observations of transient dayside convection flows have also been associated with plasma pressure variations in the solar wind.…”
Section: The Structure and Dynamics Of Mesoscale Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thus need to clarify the relative importance of local and global conditions, by investigating how the X-line properties depend on the dipole tilt angle or season (cf. Subsection 5.1.2), the nature of magnetosheath turbulence (Coleman and Freeman, 2005), etc. There is also the interesting question of how plasma β (ratio of the plasma to magnetic pressure), magnetic shear, sheared flows, etc.…”
Section: Other Remaining Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%