1984
DOI: 10.1038/309225a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal growth of copper electrodeposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
223
1
3

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 556 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
8
223
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Under diffusion-limited conditions, growth of copper by electrodeposition occurs preferentially on any protuberances, leading to dendritic and fractal growth. [12] In our experiments at lower currents globular rough surfaces were obtained. The deposited layers of copper were coated with a fluorocarbon hydrophobic layer; water drops on them then showed contact angles ranging from 115(±3)° to greater than 165°, depending upon the current density during deposition and therefore the degree of roughness of the surface.…”
Section: Table Of Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under diffusion-limited conditions, growth of copper by electrodeposition occurs preferentially on any protuberances, leading to dendritic and fractal growth. [12] In our experiments at lower currents globular rough surfaces were obtained. The deposited layers of copper were coated with a fluorocarbon hydrophobic layer; water drops on them then showed contact angles ranging from 115(±3)° to greater than 165°, depending upon the current density during deposition and therefore the degree of roughness of the surface.…”
Section: Table Of Contentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Exceptions exist, such as dielectric breakdown (Niemeyer, Pietronero & Wiesmann, 1984) and electrodeposition (Brady & Ball, 1984), in which monomer addition via DLA may be appropriate.] Early simulations of this cluster-cluster aggregation model (Meakin, 1983a;Kolb, Botet & Jullien, 1983) were relatively small simplified attempts in two dimensions (.--1000 particles) that left some doubt as to the validity of the results, but gradually more efficient and sophisticated algorithms became available (Botet, Jullien & Kolb, 1984) that reduced the uncertainties in the fractal dimension.…”
Section: Aggregates (A) Models Of Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in an incredible number of situations the objects of interest can be represented by self-similar structures over a large, even if finite, range of scales. Examples include commodity price fluctuations [9], the shape of coastlines [10], the discharge of electric fields [11], the branching of rivers [12], deposition processes [13], the growth of cities [14], fractures [15], and a variety of biological structures [16].…”
Section: Scale Invariance and Self-organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%