1994
DOI: 10.1051/ita/1994283-404051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal geometry, Turing machines and divide-and-conquer recurrences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main results concerning m-grid IFSs say that one can decide whether the fractals defined by two of them intersect and, for the subclass of non-hierarchical m-grid IFSs, whether the generated patterns are connected. These results are in contrast to the mostly negative results for related questions found so far (see the papers by Dassow and Hinz [10], Dassow, Habel, and Taubenberger [9], Drewes and Kreowski [14], and, in particular, [15] by Dube, who showed that the questions studied in the present paper are undecidable for a more general class of IFSs).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main results concerning m-grid IFSs say that one can decide whether the fractals defined by two of them intersect and, for the subclass of non-hierarchical m-grid IFSs, whether the generated patterns are connected. These results are in contrast to the mostly negative results for related questions found so far (see the papers by Dassow and Hinz [10], Dassow, Habel, and Taubenberger [9], Drewes and Kreowski [14], and, in particular, [15] by Dube, who showed that the questions studied in the present paper are undecidable for a more general class of IFSs).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the decidability results shown are in sharp contrast to certain undecidability results known from the literature on picture generating devices (cf. the work by Dassow and Hinz [10], or by Drewes and Kreowski [14], by Dassow, Habel, and Taubenberger [9], but, in particular, the paper by Dube [15], where questions like those considered here are proved to be undecidable for more general classes of IFSs). The``grid'' restriction used to obtain the positive results is on the one hand quite a strong requirement that rules out many cases one would probably also like to have decision algorithms for.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(1) Based on the undecidability of Post correspondence problem (PCP), Dube [7,8] discussed the undecidability of the problem on the invariant fractals of iterated function systems. For example, Theorem 5 of [7] actually shows that given a self-affine set in the plane, it is undecidable to test if it satisfies the SSC.…”
Section: Decidability On Fractalsmentioning
confidence: 99%