2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-0779(03)00042-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal dimensional analysis of Indian climatic dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is analyzed that regional climatic models would not be able to predict local climate as it deals with averaged quantities and that precipitation during the southwest monsoon is affected by temperature and pressure variations during the preceding winter (Kahya and Kalayci 2004;McCleary and Hay 1980;Mousavi et al 2008;Movahed and Hermanisc 2008;Park and Park 2009;Prasad and Narayana 2004;Rangarajan and Ding 2000;Rangarajan and Sant 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is analyzed that regional climatic models would not be able to predict local climate as it deals with averaged quantities and that precipitation during the southwest monsoon is affected by temperature and pressure variations during the preceding winter (Kahya and Kalayci 2004;McCleary and Hay 1980;Mousavi et al 2008;Movahed and Hermanisc 2008;Park and Park 2009;Prasad and Narayana 2004;Rangarajan and Ding 2000;Rangarajan and Sant 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Así, aparecen hechos tan interesantes como que, en regiones como la India, las precipitaciones durante el monzón del suroeste se ven afectadas por la variabilidad de la temperatura y la presión del invierno anterior. En esta misma línea, otros índices de predicción que incorporan los fractales son más fiables ya que consideran más dinámicas climáticas, con lo que se deduce que estos nuevos modelos mejoran los existentes en una escala regional (Rangarajan et al, 1997;Rangarajan et al, 2004).…”
Section: I1 Los Fractales Como Base De Estudiounclassified
“…Among the hypotheses put forward regarding monsoon intraseasonal variability (MISV) is that of a chaotic model (Palmer, 1994) with fluctuations between active and break monsoon phases (Meehl, 1994;Webster et al, 1998), analogous to the wings in the classical Lorenz system (Lorenz, 1963), in some way determined by large-scale boundary forcing. Some modelling studies using simplified GCMs (Carl, 1994;Tschentscher et al, 1994) as well as also comprehensive climate models (Goswami, 1997) have even suggested a chaotic monsoon system (see also Rangarajan and Sant, 2004). Large-scale forcing acts to change the stability and hence the population of one phase at the expense of the other as in Palmer (1999).…”
Section: A Hannachi and A G Turner: Asian Monsoon Dynamics And Isomapmentioning
confidence: 99%