2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13550-016-0216-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fractal and multifractal analysis of PET/CT images of metastatic melanoma before and after treatment with ipilimumab

Abstract: Background: PET/CT with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) images of patients suffering from metastatic melanoma have been analysed using fractal and multifractal analysis to assess the impact of monoclonal antibody ipilimumab treatment with respect to therapy outcome. Results: Thirty-one cases of patients suffering from metastatic melanoma have been scanned before and after two and after four cycles of treatment. For each patient, we calculated the fractal and multifractal dimensions using the box-counting method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical and experimental results of this work confirm different findings reported previously in the literature, such as: 1) the fractal origin of GE 1 , GE 2 , GE 5 and GE 8 , as reported in [4, 15]; 2) the fractal property of tumors once reached n med /V med , a matter that agrees with [16, 17]; 3) the role of the fractal dimension for the understanding of TGK, as suggested by Sokolov [18] and Breki et al [19]; and 4) 1 < D f < 2, in agreement with [4, 20, 21] and the preferential growth along the largest diameter of the tumor, despite its ellipsoidal geometry [1, 3, 9, 11]. This fourth finding is in contradiction with 2 < D f < 3 reported by Breki et al [19] in patients with metastatic melanoma; 5) The condition 0 < u 2 < 1 for both types of tumors is consistent with the Steel equation [12]. If u 2 = 0, then the tumor growth fraction must be high so that its mean doubling time (TD) is short, in contrast to [10, 12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The theoretical and experimental results of this work confirm different findings reported previously in the literature, such as: 1) the fractal origin of GE 1 , GE 2 , GE 5 and GE 8 , as reported in [4, 15]; 2) the fractal property of tumors once reached n med /V med , a matter that agrees with [16, 17]; 3) the role of the fractal dimension for the understanding of TGK, as suggested by Sokolov [18] and Breki et al [19]; and 4) 1 < D f < 2, in agreement with [4, 20, 21] and the preferential growth along the largest diameter of the tumor, despite its ellipsoidal geometry [1, 3, 9, 11]. This fourth finding is in contradiction with 2 < D f < 3 reported by Breki et al [19] in patients with metastatic melanoma; 5) The condition 0 < u 2 < 1 for both types of tumors is consistent with the Steel equation [12]. If u 2 = 0, then the tumor growth fraction must be high so that its mean doubling time (TD) is short, in contrast to [10, 12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The potential of fractal mathematics in oncological research and practice remains relatively unknown to most clinicians. Nevertheless, the hitherto rather limited but steadily growing literature in the field implies a possible contribution of the investigation of tumor heterogeneity, utilizing fractal principles on PET images, in tumor characterization and patient prognosis [ 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparently low specificity of these cut-off values, which conversely maintain high sensitivity, is attributable to the fact that response to immunotherapy depends on multiple factors. Imaging and metabolic data, analysed visually, semiquantitatively or with dedicated algorithms [ 36 ], are pieces of the “puzzle”. As a consequence, the metabolic characteristics of the tumour and its environment at baseline may be part of a larger panel of predictive factors of response to immunotherapy [ 37 ].…”
Section: Review Of the Use Of Fdg Pet In Immunotherapy Response Assesmentioning
confidence: 99%