2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-019-04347-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FPGA-realization of an RBF-NN tuning PI controller for sensorless PMSM drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the estimated back EMF, the rotor position is directly determined by the arctangent function in the traditional methodθ e = arctan ê α e β (5) and the electrical rotor speed can be obtained byω e = dθ e dt . However, due to using the arctangent function, the estimated position and speed are vulnerable to noise and harmonics.…”
Section: Speed and Position Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the estimated back EMF, the rotor position is directly determined by the arctangent function in the traditional methodθ e = arctan ê α e β (5) and the electrical rotor speed can be obtained byω e = dθ e dt . However, due to using the arctangent function, the estimated position and speed are vulnerable to noise and harmonics.…”
Section: Speed and Position Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve these shortcomings, sensorless control techniques have been studied. Since the back electromotive force (EMF) provides the information of rotor position and speed, back EMF-based estimators are widely proposed, such as the Luenberger observer [1,2], the extended Kalman filter (EKF) observer [3][4][5], the model reference adaptive system (MRAS) observer [6,7], or the sliding mode observer (SMO) [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Among those observers, SMO is the most applicable because it has simple structure, robustness against disturbance, low sensitivity to parameter perturbations, and easy implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using these sensors will lead to additional mounting space, higher cost and less reliability from the perspective of environmental constraints (Zhao et al , 2013). To overcome these limitations, various sensorless control techniques based on back electromotive force (EMF) estimation are proposed, such as extended Kalman filter based estimation, (Than and Kung, 2019; Zhang and Cheng, 2016) or sliding mode observer (SMO)-based estimation approaches (Chen et al , 2015; Lu et al , 2019; Wang et al , 2019; Calgan, 2022). The extended Kalman filter method has a computational complexity because of the recursive parameter estimation, while the SMO delivers high accuracy, robust estimation and low sensitivity to parameter variations (Chen et al , 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, the sensors are environment-sensitive, reducing control reliability and adaptiveness. To solve these shortcomings, various back-EMF-based (back electromotive force based) sensorless control techniques are designed and applied, such as the extended Kalman filter (EKF) approaches [1][2][3] or the sliding mode observer (SMO) approaches [4][5][6][7]. The EKF involves a lot of recursive computations because it consists of prediction and innovation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%