2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2613-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foveola nonpeeling internal limiting membrane surgery to prevent inner retinal damages in early stage 2 idiopathic macula hole

Abstract: Nonpeeling of the foveolar ILM in early stage 2 idiopathic MH surgery prevented inner retinal damages, restored umbo light reflex, achieved better foveolar microstructures, and led to better final visual acuity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
54
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Preoperative OLMH can be a risk factor for the development of postoperative FTMH. Recently, Shimada et al [7] and Ho et al [14] proposed the epi-foveal ILM preservation during ILM peeling. The technique used in the Shimada's study [7] was named 'fovea-sparing ILM peeling', which started away from the central fovea and restarted from a new site when the peeled ILM flap came close to the central fovea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Preoperative OLMH can be a risk factor for the development of postoperative FTMH. Recently, Shimada et al [7] and Ho et al [14] proposed the epi-foveal ILM preservation during ILM peeling. The technique used in the Shimada's study [7] was named 'fovea-sparing ILM peeling', which started away from the central fovea and restarted from a new site when the peeled ILM flap came close to the central fovea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of FTMH is a serious complication in highly myopic eyes [2,3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. To address this, Ho et al [15] and Shimada [7] proposed preserving the epi-foveal ILM during ILM peeling to prevent the formation of FTMH after vitrectomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been noted that ILM peeling yields favorable results for MHs larger than 400 μm but does not give the same result for holes with smaller diameters. Ho et al 28 reported that total ILM peeling for holes with small diameters may damage the fovea and is not beneficial in terms of visual outcome. In our study, we performed ILM peeling in all cases and found that base diameter did not affect final visual acuity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foveolar sparing ILM peeling is a less invasive modification of the original ILM peeling technique, which is designed for the treatment of early MHs where the foveal ILM is usually uninvolved. [37] In this procedure, a central piece of ILM of around 400 µm is preserved over the foveola, to reduce foveolar damage and preserve Muller cells. In a small retrospective study comparing traditional ILM peeling with foveolar sparing ILM peeling for early full-thickness IMH (Stage 2), VA improvement and final VA were better in the foveolar sparing group.…”
Section: Foveolar Sparing Ilm Peelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a small retrospective study comparing traditional ILM peeling with foveolar sparing ILM peeling for early full-thickness IMH (Stage 2), VA improvement and final VA were better in the foveolar sparing group. [37] ILM abrasion ILM abrasion is an alternative to ILM peeling, in which the ILM is gently rubbed around the MH by a diamond-dusted membrane scraper. [38] This technique is designed to eliminate the tractional forces on the retina without the complete removal of the ILM.…”
Section: Foveolar Sparing Ilm Peelingmentioning
confidence: 99%