1986
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(86)90011-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foveal Densitometry as a Diagnostic Technique in Stargardt's Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because normal cone optical density is approximately 0.33 for a 2 ± field, 29 for our patients with hereditary macular degeneration the mean cone optical density for a 2 ± field is only approximately 60% of the normal value. This estimate is in the range found by means of a densitometric study 7 in which seven eyes of four patients with hereditary macular degeneration and acuity 20͞32 or better had optical densities ranging from 3% to 75% of the normal value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because normal cone optical density is approximately 0.33 for a 2 ± field, 29 for our patients with hereditary macular degeneration the mean cone optical density for a 2 ± field is only approximately 60% of the normal value. This estimate is in the range found by means of a densitometric study 7 in which seven eyes of four patients with hereditary macular degeneration and acuity 20͞32 or better had optical densities ranging from 3% to 75% of the normal value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…15,16 For both hereditary macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa, reduction in cone optical density can precede loss of acuity. 5,7,17,18 For patients with retinitis pigmentosa, cone degeneration is often greater in the parafovea than in the fovea, 19 whereas in hereditary macular degeneration cone damage is often greatest in the fovea. 3 Therefore the pattern of optical-density reduction across the macula may be different in these two diseases, with hereditary macular degeneration causing greater losses in the fovea and retinitis pigmentosa causing greater losses in the parafovea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed a recent foveal densitometric study of patients with Stargardt's disease reported low two-way densities. 16 Another explanation for the observed changes in Stargardt's disease suggests that, as central cones are lost, temporal sensitivity may be increasingly determined by peripheral retinal elements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noble and Carr [4] reported ERG anomalies in only eight of the 50 patients tested, without saying if they were SD or FFM. Van Meel and van Norren [8] reported abnormal ERGs in two of their six SD patients, while their two FFM subjects had normal ERGs. In their study Hadden and Gass [11] reported seven of 36 patients with abnormal ERGs, but no information is given on which of the two conditions yielded the abnormal electroretinal signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also reported that the age of onset was significantly lower in FFM. Foveal densitometry measurements by van Meel and van Norren [8] also indicated a difference between FFM and SD, where the former was found to be closer to normal while the latter yielded markedly abnormal results. However, most of these studies did not provide the necessary information on how the diagnosis was made and at what stage was the disease process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%