2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2006.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: Results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
239
2
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 472 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
239
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The images of 100 randomly chosen nuclei (50 cells from each of two replicate slides) were analysed visually by manual scoring 14 ( Figure 1). Each image was classified according to the intensity of the fluorescence in the comet tail and was given a value of either of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 (from undamaged class 0 to maximally damaged class 4), so that the total scores of slide could be between 0 and 400 arbitrary units (AU).…”
Section: Hundred Cells Were Scored and The Number Of Viable Cells (Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images of 100 randomly chosen nuclei (50 cells from each of two replicate slides) were analysed visually by manual scoring 14 ( Figure 1). Each image was classified according to the intensity of the fluorescence in the comet tail and was given a value of either of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 (from undamaged class 0 to maximally damaged class 4), so that the total scores of slide could be between 0 and 400 arbitrary units (AU).…”
Section: Hundred Cells Were Scored and The Number Of Viable Cells (Shmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumaravel and Jha (2006) recommended that, for scientific purposes, both OTM and % Tail DNA could be used. Based on these findings, the Fourth IWGT also recommended the use of % Tail DNA for regulatory studies (Burlinson et al 2007). The Japanese Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (JaCVAM) are also recommending % Tail DNA for their inter-laboratory Comet Assay trials.…”
Section: Standardisation Of Comet Assay Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantages of the Comet Assay include: (a) the collection of data at the level of the individual cell, allowing more robust statistical analyses, (b) the need for a small number of cells per sample (<10,000), (c) sensitivity for detecting DNA damage and (d) use of any eukaryote single cell population both in vitro and in vivo, including cells obtained from exposed human populations and aquatic organisms for eco-genotoxicological studies and environmental monitoring (Collins et al 1997a;Dixon et al 2002;Lee and Steinert 2003;Jha 2004). The importance of this assay has also been realised in regulatory genotoxicological studies (Tice et al 2000;Hartmann et al 2003;Burlinson et al 2007), and there is a move to replace some traditional assays (e.g. liver unscheduled DNA synthesis assay) in regulatory genotoxicological studies with in vivo Comet assay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these studies, we evaluated the levels of single-strand breaks and alkali sensitive sites in juvenile and aged cells using the Comet assay. The average olive tail moment and percent tail DNA are two different ways to analyze the amount of DNA damage from Comet data [58]. The averages for both olive tail moment (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Age On Hr In Cultured Primary Fibroblastsmentioning
confidence: 99%