2002
DOI: 10.1139/x01-181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fourteen-year growth response of young lodgepole pine to repeated fertilization

Abstract: Four rates of N (0, 50, 100, and 150 kg·ha -1 ) with and without a fertilizer mix containing P, K, S, Ca, Mg, and micronutrients were applied to a stand of 8-year-old lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm.) in four applications during 7 years. Fourteen years after the first fertilization, mean tree basal area and volume were significantly increased in the treatments containing the two highest rates of N plus the fertilizer mix. Mean tree basal area was 38% greater and mean tree volume was 42% gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
22
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
8
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of fertilization trials vary greatly from improved yields, little or no benefit, to negative effects on plantation yield (Neilsen and Lynch, 1998;Hangs et al, 2003Hangs et al, , 2004. The success of fertilization depends on the fertilizer formulation, rate and application method of fertilizer, stock type, site characteristics, and associated silvicultural treatments (Kishchuk et al, 2002). A plausible explanation for a null fertilization response in jack pine, black spruce, and white spruce of this study may be related to site characteristics.…”
Section: Crop Tree Growthmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results of fertilization trials vary greatly from improved yields, little or no benefit, to negative effects on plantation yield (Neilsen and Lynch, 1998;Hangs et al, 2003Hangs et al, , 2004. The success of fertilization depends on the fertilizer formulation, rate and application method of fertilizer, stock type, site characteristics, and associated silvicultural treatments (Kishchuk et al, 2002). A plausible explanation for a null fertilization response in jack pine, black spruce, and white spruce of this study may be related to site characteristics.…”
Section: Crop Tree Growthmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Short-term responses (<5 years post-treatment) of www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Forest Ecology and Management 241 (2007) [115][116][117][118][119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126] planted conifers to intensive silvicultural activities abound in the literature (Thompson and Pitt, 2003), but few report the long-term (>10 years) results of intensifying management in the northern temperate and boreal forests (e.g. Kishchuk et al, 2002;Chen et al, 2006). Furthermore, few studies have examined the possible interactive effects of multiple treatments on conifer growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A considerable amount of research has focused on nutrient limitation in young and mature lodgepole pine trees, often within a silvicultural context, with different results reported in different settings (e.g., Yang, 1998 and references cited therein;Brockley, 2000Brockley, , 2003Startsev et al, 2007). Although N has often been found to be limiting, growth also may be limited primarily by other nutrients such as sulfur or boron (e.g., Brockley, 2000Brockley, , 2003Kishchuk et al, 2002;Blevins et al, 2005;Sanborn et al, 2005).…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we experimentally augmented the supply of only one nutrient, inorganic N. Additional experiments are needed to test the hypothesis of P limitation in L. argenteus and in C. rubescens when this latter species' N needs are met. Moreover, lodgepole pine may be limited by P or by trace elements, notably sulfur or boron (Brockley, 2000(Brockley, , 2003Kishchuk et al, 2002;Blevins et al, 2005;Sanborn et al, 2005), none of which was tested in this study. Second, our sample sizes were small (n = 6 for each speciestreatment combination) and our statistical analyses relatively simple.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fertilization treatments were designed as large-scale applications of previously established ''optimum nutrition'' fertilization field experiments in Sweden (Tamm et al, 1999) and BC (Kishchuk et al, 2002;Brockley, 2005). Fertilizer was applied at 2-year intervals for 10 years (total of 5 applications), using multinutrient fertilizer formulations developed from annual nutrient diagnosis of lodgepole pine foliage samples.…”
Section: Stand Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%