2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12223714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fourier Domain Anomaly Detection and Spectral Fusion for Stripe Noise Removal of TIR Imagery

Abstract: Stripe noise is a common and unwelcome noise pattern in various thermal infrared (TIR) image data including conventional TIR images and remote sensing TIR spectral images. Most existing stripe noise removal (destriping) methods are often difficult to keep a good and robust efficacy in dealing with the real-life complex noise cases. In this paper, based on the intrinsic spectral properties of TIR images and stripe noise, we propose a novel two-stage transform domain destriping method called Fourier domain anoma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned in the introduction, some repetitive texture structures in the image can be suppressed by adjusting their frequency spectrum. This kind of strategy is commonly applied in image processing of remote sensing (Jinsong et al., 2003; Zeng et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022). Considering that the stripes are not strictly periodic, and the adjustment of the frequency spectrum often shows the oscillating Gibbs effect in the space, we have designed an iterative method that combines convolution with Gaussian smoothing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the introduction, some repetitive texture structures in the image can be suppressed by adjusting their frequency spectrum. This kind of strategy is commonly applied in image processing of remote sensing (Jinsong et al., 2003; Zeng et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2022). Considering that the stripes are not strictly periodic, and the adjustment of the frequency spectrum often shows the oscillating Gibbs effect in the space, we have designed an iterative method that combines convolution with Gaussian smoothing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing results of each algorithm need to be evaluated. There are two methods of evaluation: one is subjective evaluation, which is mainly through the human eye to observe the degree of stripe noise removal and the level of information protection in non-stripe noise regions in the image; the other is objective indexes, and three evaluation indexes that are widely recognized by researchers in this field are selected in this section, namely: NR (noise reduction), which reflects the denoising ability of the algorithm [ 28 , 29 ], MRD (mean relative deviation), which characterizes the degree of information loss in the non-stripe noise region of the image after denoising [ 29 , 30 ], and ID (image distortion), which reflects the fidelity level of the algorithm [ 15 , 31 ]. The definitions of these three metrics are shown in formulas ( 32 )–( 34 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative Results: The quantitative results are shown in Table I. We added Gaussian-distributed stripe noise with noise level σ ∈ [0, 0.10], Uniform-distributed stripe noise with noise level µ ∈ [−0.10, 0.10], and periodic stripe noise T ∈ [6,7,8,9] on each test sets. The best, second-best, and third-best results are indicated in bold, underlined, and italicized font, respectively.…”
Section: B Simulated Image Destripingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the widespread applications of the task, numerous techniques have been proposed for single-image destriping. For instance, various methods use handcrafted features to distinguish between background and stripe components of the IR image, which employ filters [8], [9], [10], data statistics [11], [12], [13], and other optimization techniques [14], [15], [16]. They leverage empirical observations of image properties that can achieve acceptable performance for relatively simple scenes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%