1987
DOI: 10.1016/0741-5214(87)90311-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four years' results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing polytetrafluoroethylene and modified human umbilical vein for below-knee femoropopliteal bypass

Abstract: Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (Gore-Tex) and human umbilical vein (Biograft) arterial grafts were compared for below-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting in a prospective randomized clinical trial. One hundred five patients (105 limbs) entered the trial. Seventysix percent suffered from rest pain, ulceration, or gangrene. The median postoperative ankle-arm blood pressure index was 0.36. Twenty-three limbs had three patent tibia1 arteries, 46 limbs had two tibial arteries, 31 limbs had one patent artery, and f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there seems little doubt that autogenous vein is superior to the most common alternatives, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and umbilical vein (UV), the relative merits of PTFE and UV, how well they perform in comparison with autogenous vein at different levels of distal anastomosis, and whether or not in situ bypass is innately superior to reversed saphenous vein--all are unsettled issues despite results from several prospective randomized trials. [1][2][3] This article presents data bearing on these questions, gathered from the follow-up at 3 years, of almost 250 well-documented cases of difficult distal bypass, originally entered in a trial of the efficacy ofdextran 40 in preventing early graft thrombosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there seems little doubt that autogenous vein is superior to the most common alternatives, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and umbilical vein (UV), the relative merits of PTFE and UV, how well they perform in comparison with autogenous vein at different levels of distal anastomosis, and whether or not in situ bypass is innately superior to reversed saphenous vein--all are unsettled issues despite results from several prospective randomized trials. [1][2][3] This article presents data bearing on these questions, gathered from the follow-up at 3 years, of almost 250 well-documented cases of difficult distal bypass, originally entered in a trial of the efficacy ofdextran 40 in preventing early graft thrombosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several prospective, randomized clinical trials have shown the efficacy of umbilical vein grafts for femoropopliteal bypass. [10][11][12][13] A study by Johnson and Lee 14 from Boston showed that umbilical vein grafts had a patency of 70% at 2 years when used for above-knee femoral-popliteal bypass procedures. This was inferior to saphenous vein grafts but superior to polytetrafluoroethylene grafts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ePTFE or Dacron) are the conduits of choice. However, for small diameter reconstructions, such prosthetic grafts have low cumulative patencies, ranging from 24 to 58% after 3 years [25,26] . These results have stimulated research in alternatives to prosthetic grafts such as preserved vascular allografts and xenografts, and the use of biomaterials to serve as a vascular tissue matrix [27,28] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%