2001
DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.3840704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four‐week test‐retest stability of individual differences in the saccadic CNV, two saccadic task parameters, and selected neuropsychological tests

Abstract: The aim of the present study was the comparative assessment of the 4-week test-retest stabilities of the saccadic CNV (sCNV) and saccadic reaction times (SRT) during the execution of pro- and antisaccades, as well as the stability of RT during execution of two neuropsychological tests of alertness and S-R incompatibility. Prosaccades were elicited under the 200-ms gap and overlap conditions, antisaccades under the overlap condition (64 trials each). The EEG was recorded from 25 channels with a DC amplifier (ME… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(36 reference statements)
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide an estimate of the differences in magnitude between ICC and Pearson correlations, and to allow compar-isons with previous studies (Campion et al, 1992;Gooding et al, 1994;Klein & Berg, 2001;Schlenker & Cohen, 1995), both coefficients are reported here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To provide an estimate of the differences in magnitude between ICC and Pearson correlations, and to allow compar-isons with previous studies (Campion et al, 1992;Gooding et al, 1994;Klein & Berg, 2001;Schlenker & Cohen, 1995), both coefficients are reported here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roy-Byrne et al (1995) reported nonsignificant intraclass correlations (ICC) for the key antisaccade measure, namely, the error rate, probably due to the restricted range of scores (the number of errors ranged between 0 and 2) and the small sample size (N 5 8). Klein and Berg (2001) reported poor reliability of the antisaccade error rate in 20 individuals. Given the proposition that the antisaccade error rate might be a useful schizophrenia endophenotype (Calkins & Iacono, 2000;Clementz, 1998), its temporal stability must first be clarified.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been proposed that visual saccades may provide a means to probe components of the cortical network underlying executive function and may provide an objective measure of impaired neural circuitry in these disorders of executive functioning (Manoach et al, 2002; Green et al, 2007). Visual prosaccade tasks provide an advantage over standard neuropsychological tests because a prosaccade task offers a measure of stimulus-initiated reflexive responses and hence is less susceptible to socio-cultural influences (Klein and Berg, 2001). This allows assessment of a broad spectrum of individuals with varying age, ability levels, and cultural backgrounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for this is also limited as the only studies to assess practice effects were completed over shorter periods with intense practicing. [23][24][25] It is not clear that practice effects would persist over 3 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for this is also limited as the only studies to assess practice effects were completed over shorter periods with intense practicing. [23][24][25] It is not clear that practice effects would persist over 3 months.Antisaccades and self-paced saccades are both volitional. Whole-group analyses also revealed no reduction in the rate of self-paced saccades for children with mCHI, in contrast to studies of adults with mTBI and severe TBI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%