1997
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008239800630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four-step high-dose sequential chemotherapy with hematopoietic progenitor-cell support as induction treatment for patients with solid tumors

Abstract: Support with hematopoietic progenitor cells and growth factors allows the timely administration of repetitive cycles of high-dose chemotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients, resulting in a significant increase in dose intensity. Toxicity is noteworthy but manageable and does not compromise further therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, to our knowledge, no case of TM has been described in previous studies of multiple cycles of moderately escalated chemotherapy with PBSC support. [4][5][6][7][8][9] By contrast, in other studies in which very highdose chemotherapy was administered over a short time schedule, a pattern of endothelial toxicity, reminiscent of that observed in our study, has been described in some instances. In the study by Rodenhuis et al, 25 two of the seven patients who completed the protocol without dose reduction experienced TM, which was fatal to one of them, and another patient died of veno-occlusive disease.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, to our knowledge, no case of TM has been described in previous studies of multiple cycles of moderately escalated chemotherapy with PBSC support. [4][5][6][7][8][9] By contrast, in other studies in which very highdose chemotherapy was administered over a short time schedule, a pattern of endothelial toxicity, reminiscent of that observed in our study, has been described in some instances. In the study by Rodenhuis et al, 25 two of the seven patients who completed the protocol without dose reduction experienced TM, which was fatal to one of them, and another patient died of veno-occlusive disease.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Several phase II trials have demonstrated the feasibility of this approach in first-line therapy with moderately escalated chemotherapy doses without unexpected toxicity, in poor prognosis cancer patients. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Given the low probability of cure in refractory or early relapsed aggressive NHL, we conducted a pilot study of sequential HDC consisting of high-dose alkylating agents, cytarabine and etoposide, which are the most effective drugs used in second-line salvage therapies and are also widely used in high-dose conditioning regimens in NHL. We report a high incidence of extra-hematological toxicity, and particularly of thrombotic microangiopathy (TM) with this regimen which was also associated with a low probability of cure in refractory NHL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support can ameliorate the hematopoietic toxicity of intensive chemotherapy and allow maximal dose intensification. [3][4][5] PBSC can be mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) following multi-agent chemotherapy and reinfused as a stem-cell rescue following severely myelosuppressive therapy. However, since metastic sarcomas often have marrow involvement, tumor contamination in PBSC collections may contribute to relapse.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used drugs in published repetitive high-dose therapy regimens have been the alkylating agents, carboplatin and the anthracyclines. Although the results of studies utilizing doseescalated anthracyclines are promising, [19][20][21][22] our protocol did not incorporate these agents as we predicted that the population of patients considered for such therapies were likely to have previously failed an anthracycline-based regimen. This was the case with 72% having received a prior anthracycline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%