1986
DOI: 10.13182/nt86-a33848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four Nondestructive Electrochemical Tests for Detecting Sensitization in Type 304 and 304L Stainless Steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The disadvantage of the SL-EPR test is its sensitivity to the surface condition of the specimen. This was resolved in the DL-EPR test (Akashi, Kawamoto, & Umemura, 1980;Majidi & Streicher, 1984) and another simplified EPR method based on a combination of features from the SL-EPR and DL-EPR methods (Majidi & Streicher, 1986).…”
Section: Dl-epr Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The disadvantage of the SL-EPR test is its sensitivity to the surface condition of the specimen. This was resolved in the DL-EPR test (Akashi, Kawamoto, & Umemura, 1980;Majidi & Streicher, 1984) and another simplified EPR method based on a combination of features from the SL-EPR and DL-EPR methods (Majidi & Streicher, 1986).…”
Section: Dl-epr Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another simplified EPR has been suggested by Majidi and Streicher (1986). The need for 1 μm surface finish for the reactivation procedure can be eliminated by replacing the first anodic scan of the double loop EPR test by keeping at a potential of -230 mV (SCE) for 2 min (this is the potential at which the current is maximum during the first anodic scan in the double-loop test) using only the 100-grit surface finish.…”
Section: Simplified Epr Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…140, No. 12, December 1993 9 The Electrochemical Society, Inc. [8] where T* is given by T/2000 for 304 type stainless steel. For a temperature of 600~ 7or is equal to 2.86.…”
Section: Fig 5 Sl-epr Polarization Curves For 3045s (Heat A): (A) Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterise the grain boundary susceptibility against corrosion attack, various tests have been used. These tests are specific to Cr-depletion at grain boundaries for steels containing carbon, like electrolytic oxalic acid test [9], electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation (EPR) test [9 ± 13], Strauû test [1,2,11], copper-copper sulfat test and slow strain rate test (SSRT) under hot water conditions [1,4,12,14,15], as well as to segregation of impurities (S, P) to grain boundaries, like nitric acid test (Huey) [1,2,4,5,11,13], nitric acid-chromate test (Coriou) [12] and SSRT. Generally, the main point of research has been devoted to measure the intensity of intergranular corrosion (IGC) attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%