1974
DOI: 10.2307/3560587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four Indicators of Humanhood: The Enquiry Matures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this premise would lead to admitting that a human being with intellectual and developmental disability that manifests significant cognitive deficits should not be considered a person. This is the position of Fletcher 26 The objection would then be formulated: human beings with intellectual disabilities who lose or have never manifested qualities linked to the use of rationality (self-consciousness, self-control or relational capacity) would not have that which identifies us as human persons. This is a consequence of the definition of the concept of "person" used by Fletcher 26 , MacMahan 31 and Singer 32 .…”
Section: Disability: Loss or Non-manifestation Of Qualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, this premise would lead to admitting that a human being with intellectual and developmental disability that manifests significant cognitive deficits should not be considered a person. This is the position of Fletcher 26 The objection would then be formulated: human beings with intellectual disabilities who lose or have never manifested qualities linked to the use of rationality (self-consciousness, self-control or relational capacity) would not have that which identifies us as human persons. This is a consequence of the definition of the concept of "person" used by Fletcher 26 , MacMahan 31 and Singer 32 .…”
Section: Disability: Loss or Non-manifestation Of Qualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the position of Fletcher 26 The objection would then be formulated: human beings with intellectual disabilities who lose or have never manifested qualities linked to the use of rationality (self-consciousness, self-control or relational capacity) would not have that which identifies us as human persons. This is a consequence of the definition of the concept of "person" used by Fletcher 26 , MacMahan 31 and Singer 32 . That is, only as an entity that is self-conscious, rational, capable of moral activity and endowed with autonomy [27][28][29][30]33 .…”
Section: Disability: Loss or Non-manifestation Of Qualitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The assertion that we can define personhood by one or more characteristics or capabilities is commonplace. Fletcher, for example, would have us standardize personhood, and therefore dignity, by means of an IQ test (Fletcher 1972(Fletcher , 2012. Tooley, in his disturbing article "Abortion and Infanticide," argues that the necessary criterion for personhood, protection of rights, and dignity is self-consciousness (1972).…”
Section: Dignity As Capability-dependentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extrinsic value is not a per se condition of life and some are said to lack it. 9 From the totalitarian view that the individual exists for the society one can conclude that experiments can be performed on a member of this generation in order to benefit the members of future generations. An experiment performed on a pregnant woman scheduled for abortion may help a "wanted" child to have a better chance of survival.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%