2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-020-09502-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four-Field Co-evolutionary Model for Human Cognition: Variation in the Middle Stone Age/Middle Palaeolithic

Abstract: Here we explore variation and similarities in the two best-represented population groups who lived during the Middle Stone Age and Middle Palaeolithic—the Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. Building on approaches such as gene-culture co-evolution, we propose a four-field model to discuss relationships between human cognitive evolution, biology, technology, society, and ecology. We focus on the pre-50-ka phase, because we reason that later admixing between Neanderthals and Homo sapiens in Eurasia may make it diffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 229 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in a large genome-wide association meta-analysis of brain magnetic resonance imaging data from 51,665 individuals seeking to identify specific genetic loci that influence human cortical structure [42], one variant (rs75255901) in Table 1, linked to DAAM1, has been identified as a putative causal variant affecting the precuneus. All these brain structures have been independently argued to have undergone recent evolution in our lineage [37,43,44,45], and their associated variants are dated amongst the most recent ones in the table.…”
Section: Gene Expression Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in a large genome-wide association meta-analysis of brain magnetic resonance imaging data from 51,665 individuals seeking to identify specific genetic loci that influence human cortical structure [42], one variant (rs75255901) in Table 1, linked to DAAM1, has been identified as a putative causal variant affecting the precuneus. All these brain structures have been independently argued to have undergone recent evolution in our lineage [37,43,44,45], and their associated variants are dated amongst the most recent ones in the table.…”
Section: Gene Expression Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle entails that the grades of causal understanding do not necessarily follow a unilinear evolutionary trajectory. Aspects of each type of thinking may have evolved parallel to one another, or are still evolving within continuing coevolutionary feedback loops with other relevant fields such as social frameworks, human biology (e.g., brain and DNA) and ecology (Lombard and Högberg 2021). Within each grade of causal understanding there might also be several levels of complexity that developed at different times in different places and/or in different hominin populations.…”
Section: Grades Of Causal Cognition Their Relation To Theory Of Mindmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumptions of simulations are not necessarily incorrect. However, taking one outcome as virtually inevitable, and ignoring gene-flow between populations (see discussion in Lombard and Högberg 2021), is of limited value in testing hypotheses on the causes and likelihood of that outcome. This excursion illustrates the kind of gradualist, teleological thinking that dominates ideas on hominin anatomic, behavioural, and technological evolution.…”
Section: Computer Simulation-teleology In Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%