2019
DOI: 10.1111/epi.14648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four‐dimensional functional cortical maps of visual and auditory language: Intracranial recording

Abstract: Summary Objective The strength of presurgical language mapping using electrocorticography (ECoG) is its outstanding signal fidelity and temporal resolution, but the weakness includes limited spatial sampling at an individual patient level. By averaging naming‐related high‐gamma activity at nonepileptic regions across a large number of patients, we provided the functional cortical atlases animating the neural dynamics supporting visual‐object and auditory‐description naming at the whole brain level. Methods We … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(118 reference statements)
1
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of left posterior lateral and medial temporal lobe regions for semantic processing is well documented [ 18 , 19 ]. In line with previous findings [ 20 ], picture naming elicited activations preferentially in posterobasal temporal and temporooccipital regions associated with visual object processing, including the posterior fusiform gyrus. Auditory naming activated more lateral cortical areas including the inferior and middle temporal gyri, and more extensively involved inferior frontal and premotor regions compared to picture naming.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The significance of left posterior lateral and medial temporal lobe regions for semantic processing is well documented [ 18 , 19 ]. In line with previous findings [ 20 ], picture naming elicited activations preferentially in posterobasal temporal and temporooccipital regions associated with visual object processing, including the posterior fusiform gyrus. Auditory naming activated more lateral cortical areas including the inferior and middle temporal gyri, and more extensively involved inferior frontal and premotor regions compared to picture naming.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Intracranial studies have been used to map the auditory and visual language networks at the whole-brain level (e.g., Nakai et al, 2017 ). Particularly, the auditory naming task was suggested to recruit the left frontal region more extensively than picture naming ( Nakai et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodological Aspects Of Electrical Cortical Stimulation Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sentence production task requires extensive analysis of the visual scene involving multiple domains and a long duration of utterance response. Collective evidence indicates that semantic, lexical, and phonological processes are exerted by large-scale networks in the temporal, parietal, and frontal lobe association cortex with left-hemispheric dominance 33 , 44 , 45 . Linking each part of the description into a single sentence also requires substantial verbal working memory activation, which may further involve the association cortex of either hemisphere 46 48 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linking each part of the description into a single sentence also requires substantial verbal working memory activation, which may further involve the association cortex of either hemisphere [46][47][48] . In contrast, overt production of non-filler phrases was previously reported to maximize the degree of neural activation in the primary sensorimotor cortex following the subsidence of neural activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus 32,44 . One cannot rule out the possibility that our patients spontaneously used fillers as a method to communicate their intention 49,50 .…”
Section: Statistical Analysis To Determine the Effect Of Filler Uttermentioning
confidence: 94%