2019
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1512847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four Covariance Structure Models for Canonical Correlation Analysis: A COSAN Modeling Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide a test on significant overlap between EAS and the two ECQ versions with respect to our hypotheses H1a, H1b, and H2, we conducted a canonical correlation analysis following Gu et al (2019; also see Kim & Shin, 2021, for a content‐related application) between three sets of variables (the four EAS and the four ECQ scale self‐reports and observations), and results are given in Table 3 with a significant test of the first root (any second root was not significant). Table 4 reports in more detail the explained variance in each of the EAS and ECQ measures based on results from the canonical correlation analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a test on significant overlap between EAS and the two ECQ versions with respect to our hypotheses H1a, H1b, and H2, we conducted a canonical correlation analysis following Gu et al (2019; also see Kim & Shin, 2021, for a content‐related application) between three sets of variables (the four EAS and the four ECQ scale self‐reports and observations), and results are given in Table 3 with a significant test of the first root (any second root was not significant). Table 4 reports in more detail the explained variance in each of the EAS and ECQ measures based on results from the canonical correlation analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of this study CCA was preferred to structural equation modeling (SEM), although CCA could be expressed within the framework of SEM 36 . However, the SEM approach to CCA is complicated 37 . The CCA approach has two additional advantages.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 However, the SEM approach to CCA is complicated. 37 The CCA approach has two additional advantages. Firstly, CCA is more exploratory, whereas SEM can be confirmatory and requires a well-established measurement model.…”
Section: Data Analysis Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In applications of canonical correlation analysis (CCA), rotation of the canonical loadings is recommended to facilitate the interpretation of canonical variates. Based on the COSAN modeling approach to CCA proposed by (Gu et al 2019), we describe the infinitesimal jackknife (IJ) method in modified COSAN -CCA models to obtain the IJ estimates of standard errors for rotated CCA estimates. Specifically, given two CCA rotation strategies (i.e., concurrent and separate) and two types of rotation method (i.e., orthogonal and oblique), our descriptions of the modified COSAN-CCA models and IJ method cover four rotation strategy-method combinations: concurrent-orthogonal, concurrent-oblique, separate-orthogonal, and separate-oblique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%