2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four approaches to preservice teachers’ involvement in the writing of case stories: a qualitative research project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Feedback from faculty included appropriateness of case content, degree of detail and difficulty, and the perceived value of cases 13,51 , 79 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Feedback from faculty included appropriateness of case content, degree of detail and difficulty, and the perceived value of cases 13,51 , 79 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cases should reveal to learners the outcomes of their choices, both positive and negative, to help a learners' self‐assessment, 15,18 to keep learners engaged, 62 and to help them identify further learning needs 12,80 , 81 . Displaying negative outcomes resulting from learners' incorrect expectations or preconceptions prompts them to explain rationales behind their choices 9–94 . Two studies describe a feature built into computer cases that allowed learners to progress through the case only after they had selected the correct answers 17,78 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given methodological limitations, the assessment of reflective thinking raises both issues of consistency as well as ethical concerns. While there are studies which have attempted to quantify reflection (Sparks-Langer et al, 1990;Seng, 2001), most of our understanding of reflection in teacher education has been derived from qualitative research (Wade & Yarbrough, 1996;Barksdale-Ladd et al, 2001;Darling, 2001;Cautreels, 2003). Increasingly, learning journals are used as a way to initiate critical reflection in university students, whereas many teacher training programmes utilise journals as vehicles for systematic reflection (Bolin, 1990;Hoover, 1994;Clarke, 1995;Black et al, 2000;Trotman & Kerr, 2001;Bain et al, 2002;Good & Whang, 2002;Spalding & Wilson, 2002).…”
Section: Current Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se puede encontrar también otro cuerpo de investigaciones que exploran tareas escritas como medios para desarrollar la reflexión pedagógica, pero que conceptualizan la reflexión de forma diferente; por ejemplo, como una oportunidad para relacionar el ámbito personal con el profesional (Barksdale-Ladd et al, 2001;Braun y Cumpler, 2004;Le Fevre, 2011), como cuando se recuperan experiencias previas de aprendizaje, de modo que los futuros profesores recuerden cómo era ser estudiantes y qué estrategias de enseñanza les ayudaban más. Las memorias sociales, las narraciones de niños, las autobiografías, entre otros géneros más narrativos, se presentan en la literatura especializada en relación con la noción de que el conocimiento pedagógico se puede representar narrativamente, lo que afecta la percepción y las decisiones de los docentes (Le Fevre, 2011).…”
Section: Alfabetización Pedagógicaunclassified