2004
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m405653200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Four Amino Acids in the α Subunits Determine the γ-Aminobutyric Acid Sensitivities of GABAA Receptor Subtypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(29 reference statements)
2
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Averaged hill numbers were not significantly different (p > 0.05) among the receptor isoforms and ranged from 1.04 ± 0.15 (α6) to 1.48 ± 0.12 (α1). The relative relationship of α6 < α4=α5 < α1=α2 < α3 is generally consistent with previously reported values using a variety of expression systems and subunit combinations (Dučićet al, 1995;Böhme et al, 2004).…”
Section: Whole-cell Gaba Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Averaged hill numbers were not significantly different (p > 0.05) among the receptor isoforms and ranged from 1.04 ± 0.15 (α6) to 1.48 ± 0.12 (α1). The relative relationship of α6 < α4=α5 < α1=α2 < α3 is generally consistent with previously reported values using a variety of expression systems and subunit combinations (Dučićet al, 1995;Böhme et al, 2004).…”
Section: Whole-cell Gaba Sensitivitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A variety of heterogeneous sites within the extracellular Nterminal domain of α subunits have been reported to influence GABA sensitivity (Böhme et al, 2004;Drafts and Fisher, 2004) but few studies have examined the structural basis for differences in macroscopic kinetics. It is perhaps not surprising that complex interactions among different regions of the subunits appear to control deactivation and desensitization kinetics (Bianchi et al, 2001(Bianchi et al, , 2002aBianchi and Macdonald 2002;Fisher, 2004b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sitedirected mutagenesis and molecular modeling have delineated the agonist binding site as formed by a series of ␤-sheet and loop motifs from ␣ and ␤ subunits, with several critical amino acid residues mediating molecular interactions between the receptor and agonist (Sigel et al, 1992;Wagner and Czajkowski, 2001;Wagner et al, 2004). Because the amino acid sequence is variable among isoforms, switching a single subunit (i.e., ␣1 to ␣3) can alter the identity of the key residues within the binding site (Bohme et al, 2004). This could produce changes in binding and unbinding kinetics by altering the physical shape of the binding pocket or through perturbation of molecular forces (i.e., electrostatic interactions) between the receptor and GABA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if GABA itself promotes the expression of KCC2 is still under debate (Ganguly et al 2001;Ludwig et al 2003;Titz et al 2003). Further, the a subunits are critical elements in determining the nature of the GABA A receptor response to GABA (Böhme et al 2004). The a3 mRNA (Gabra-3) is present at high levels in several forebrain regions at birth with a major decline after post-natal day 12 (P12), when the expression of a1 is going up (Laurie et al 1992).…”
Section: Editing Of the I/m Site Is Developmentally Regulatedmentioning
confidence: 99%