Founders' uses of digital networks for resource acquisition: Extending network theory online

Smith, Claudia; Smith, J. Brock

doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.032

Cited by 23 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 93 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, we extend prior research on entrepreneurs' digital identities (e.g., Fischer and Reuber, 2011;Obschonka et al, 2017;Smith et al, 2017). So far, previous entrepreneurship research has assessed digital identities in the context of communication and networking strategies (e.g., Fischer and Reuber, 2011;Smith and Smith, 2019) and linked them to measures of entrepreneurial behavior, financing, and success (e.g., Block et al, 2019;Obschonka et al, 2017;Winkler et al, 2020). While these studies primarily focus on cross-sectional differences between entrepreneurs, we know little about whether and how entrepreneur's digital identities change over time and, in particular, how they are affected by "offline" businessrelated events such as failure.…”

Section: Contributions To Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning

confidence: 59%

“…Several entrepreneurship studies highlight the potential applications of information based on digital footprints (e.g., Nambisan, 2017;Smith et al, 2017). Existing studies draw on digital footprints to analyze the acquisition of resources in entrepreneurial ventures (Smith and Smith, 2019), the accumulation of social capital in an online context (Smith et al, 2017), or an entrepreneurial venture's communication strategies in a predominantly digital setting Reuber, 2011, 2014). While these studies show that research based on digital footprints is relevant, they mention entrepreneurs' digital identities rather parenthetically.…”

Section: Research On Entrepreneur's Digital Identitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hence, entrepreneurs' digital identities (i.e., their digital self-representation on social media sites) are increasingly important for a venture's success in today's digital age (e.g., Nambisan, 2017;Smith et al, 2017). Recent studies agree that research on digital identities is both highly relevant and timely (e.g., Fischer and Reuber, 2014;Smith and Smith, 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

How does entrepreneurial failure change an entrepreneur's digital identity? Evidence from Twitter data

Fisch

Block

2021

Journal of Business Venturing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We assess whether and how entrepreneurs' digital identities change in response to entrepreneurial failure based on a sample of 760 entrepreneurs who experienced failure. We analyze a longitudinal dataset of Twitter messages before, during, and after a business failure with a language-based method of computerized text analysis. The results of our explorative research indicate that the financial, social, and psychological consequences of failure are reflected in entrepreneurs' Tweets and lead to changes in their digital identities. Among others, entrepreneurs' language decreases in emotional tone and indicates increased psychological distress. Simultaneously, we observe higher levels of self-assurance and reflection after failure. We conclude by outlining the potential of using Twitter-generated digital footprints in future entrepreneurship research.

show abstract

Section: Contributions To Entrepreneurship Researchmentioning

confidence: 59%

Section: Research On Entrepreneur's Digital Identitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How does entrepreneurial failure change an entrepreneur's digital identity? Evidence from Twitter data

Fisch

Block

2021

Journal of Business Venturing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The yellow cluster deals with digital entrepreneurship (Nambisan, 2017) and the multiple ways through which entrepreneurs profit from their ventures on social media (Sahaym et al, 2019), the digital strategy they implement (Correani et al, 2020), the different networks and partners they engage with in order to access key resources (Smith & Smith, 2019), the entrepreneurial opportunities offered by new technological architectures (Chalmers et al, 2019), and the opportunities provided to employees to innovate (Reibenspiess et al, 2020). Furthermore, the cluster emphasizes the need to manage the contrasting perspectives between digital and non‐digital start‐ups (Kollmann et al, 2019), hence dealing with issues at the level of enterprise systems (Sedera et al, 2016), governance mechanisms, and platform organization (Saadatmand et al, 2019).…”

Section: Digital Transformation and Innovation Management: Opening Upmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Transformation and Innovation Management: A Synthesis of Existing Research and an Agenda for Future Studies

Appio

Frattini

Petruzzelli

et al. 2021

J of Product Innov Manag

355

176

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Management and organizational scholars have paid increasing attention to the interconnections between digital transformation and innovation management in the last decade. However, a highly fragmented understanding of this topic is what we are left with so far. In this editorial, we suggest an approach to open up the black box of the interplay between digital transformation and innovation management by providing a framework that identifies three levels of analyisis (i.e., macro, meso, and micro) along which existing and future research on the topic can be organized. This model encourages scholars to conduct theoretical and empirical studies on how digital transformation affects ecosystems’ structure and governance, how industries and firms compete and organize for innovation in a digitalized world, how the processes for developing new products and services change under the effect of digital technologies, and the implications of digital transformation on managing people and teams involved in the innovation process, among the other topics. We also provide a synthesis of the eight papers published in the Special Issue that this editorial introduces and develop an agenda for future research that will hopefully contribute to encourage and shape future scholarly efforts into this field.

show abstract

“…Indeed, the entire hypotheses was confirmed the entire hypotheses testing, and the value should be having to pursue the consumer value creation (VC) and the customer loyalty (CL) within the digital wallet firms in Jakarta; The hybrid-marketing model of the determinant to consumer value creation (VC) and the customer loyalty (CL) within the digital wallet firms in Jakarta could gave the body of knowledge of the SDL theory that the marketing-model could pursue positively and confirmed the achievement of customer loyalty within re-purchase some product utilized the digital wallet in Jakarta. (Mishra, 2016;Reydet & Carsana, 2017;Smith & Smith, 2019) The limitation in data survey within the global-pandemic to gain more respondents to participate was to limited, that the scholars could utility the simulations-data within normal distributions.…”

Section: Conclusion and Research Contributionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Pursue of the Customer Loyalty: Study on Consumer Ovo Digital- Wallet Users in Jakarta

John¹,

Yulius²,

Susilo³

2021

IJRCMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of intellectual capital, digital technology quality, and customer knowledge on value creation and its implications for customer loyalty on OVO digital wallet users in Jakarta partially and together. Furthermore, the 255 sample of this study is consumers who use OVO digital wallets. In this study in Jakarta-Indonesia and the data analysis method conducted within the Structural Equation Modeling and the confirmed strategic analysis. Hence, the results showed:1) Intellectual capital has a partial effect on value creation in consumers who use OVO digital wallets; 2) Digital technology quality partially influences value creation in consumers who use OVO digital wallets; 3) Customer knowledge partially influences value creation in consumers who use OVO digital wallets; 4) Intellectual capital, digital technology quality and customer knowledge simultaneously influence the value creation of OVO digital wallet users; 5) Intellectual capital affects customer loyalty to consumers who use OVO digital wallets; 6) Digital quality technology has a partial effect on customer loyalty to consumers who use OVO digital wallets; 7) Customer knowledge affects customer loyalty to consumers who use OVO digital wallets; 8) Value creation affects customer loyalty to consumers who use OVO digital wallets; 9) Intellectual capital, digital technology quality, customer knowledge and value creation together have a simultaneous effect on customer loyalty of OVO digital wallet users with R square value .85, so that the results of this study found the results of intellectual capital, digital technology-quality, and customer knowledge influence customer loyalty through variable value creation had the full mediation research marketing model.

show abstract

Founders' uses of digital networks for resource acquisition: Extending network theory online

Cited by 23 publications

References 93 publications

How does entrepreneurial failure change an entrepreneur's digital identity? Evidence from Twitter data

How does entrepreneurial failure change an entrepreneur's digital identity? Evidence from Twitter data

Digital Transformation and Innovation Management: A Synthesis of Existing Research and an Agenda for Future Studies

The Pursue of the Customer Loyalty: Study on Consumer Ovo Digital- Wallet Users in Jakarta

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About