1960
DOI: 10.1070/rm1960v015n06abeh001116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foundations of the Theory of Categories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying v 0 , we can define the notion of internal direct decomposition and internal direct factor of A similarly to the case of groups (cf., e.g., Kurosh [21], p. 106).…”
Section: L-varieties and L * -Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying v 0 , we can define the notion of internal direct decomposition and internal direct factor of A similarly to the case of groups (cf., e.g., Kurosh [21], p. 106).…”
Section: L-varieties and L * -Varietiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…~') In view of terminological differences appearing in the literature we wish to emphasize that the terms "monomorphism" and "epimerphism" are used in agreement with [9], see also [1]: A map ~: X-~ Y in the category ~ is a monomorphism if, for all ZE~ and maps g, h : Z --> X in ~, ]g ~/h implies g ~ h; and dually for epimorphisms.…”
Section: Prol~osition 13 Left Equalizers Are Monomorphisms Right Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the introduction, we can now provide a new proof of the following result of La Martin [6]; our proof is a topologized version of the original proof ( [5]; see also [9]) that epimorphisms of groups are surjective.…”
Section: Corollary With the Quotient Topology Determined By P G Is mentioning
confidence: 99%