Relativistic Effects in Atoms, Molecules, and Solids 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3596-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foundations of the Relativistic Theory of Many-Electron systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach cannot give a proper treatm ent of nuclear properties and hyperfine interactions, nor does it include annihilation forces between electrons and positrons as in positronium, nor does it incorporate quantum electrodynamics, although th a t could be put into the potential. Finally, nothing has been said about the negative energies entailed by the relativistic form of the ham iltonian; the m atter has been extensively discussed since the work of Brown & Ravenhall (1951) (see Sucher 1983); here it is tacitly assumed th a t a solution can be found to the problem. I thank Professor Abdus Salam, F.R.S., the International Atomic Energy Agency and UNESCO for hospitality at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approach cannot give a proper treatm ent of nuclear properties and hyperfine interactions, nor does it include annihilation forces between electrons and positrons as in positronium, nor does it incorporate quantum electrodynamics, although th a t could be put into the potential. Finally, nothing has been said about the negative energies entailed by the relativistic form of the ham iltonian; the m atter has been extensively discussed since the work of Brown & Ravenhall (1951) (see Sucher 1983); here it is tacitly assumed th a t a solution can be found to the problem. I thank Professor Abdus Salam, F.R.S., the International Atomic Energy Agency and UNESCO for hospitality at the International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In much of the work just mentioned, attention has been concentrated on the interactions between particles and on the problem of states of negative energy (for a review see Sucher 1983), and the form of the kinetic energy operator seems to have been written down almost without discussion with the exception of Kemmer (I 937)-Thus, generally, the kinetic energy of a system of many electrons around a nucleus of infinite mass has been taken to be just the sum of the kinetic energies (in Dirac form) of the individual electrons. W ith th a t approxim ation, it is not possible to include the reduced-mass effect of the motion of the nucleus (but see B arut & Komy 1985), and th a t is satisfactory for atom s w ith m any electrons, in which the electron-electron interactions are far more im portant than the effects of the motions of nuclei with finite mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These problems were originally formulated by B. Jeziorski who is a chemist from the University of Warsaw (cf. J. Sucher [10] p.6). Among them there are spectral problems on Dirac-Coulomb operator H DC for a helium-like ion, which has the form…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sucher proposed [25][26][27][28] a no-pair many-particle Hamiltonian based on relativistic QED that is reminiscent to the naïvely constructed Hamiltonian in Eq. ( 1) with the important difference that it is projected with Λ + to the positive energy states (E + ) of a non-interacting reference problem, H 0 = n i=1 (h i + u i ):…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sucher explains [25][26][27][28] that H 0 can be either the kinetic energy of the free spin-1/2 fermions or some other bound model without fermion-fermion interactions following Furry's work [29]. This no-pair operator, in some cases called the Brown-Ravenhall operator [30], has well-defined mathematical properties, and most importantly, it is bounded from below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%