2019
DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foundation doctors and quality improvement: frustrations from the frontline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I welcome the suggested involvement of “interprofessional teams,” “clearly allocated time,” and ensuring more autonomy as project leaders, but this doesn’t go far enough. Quality improvement work is both a part of the General Medical Council’s Good Medical Practice guide and mandatory for UK doctors’ training progression 2. But early career doctors already spend a large proportion of time on administrative tasks, which have been associated with burnout 3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I welcome the suggested involvement of “interprofessional teams,” “clearly allocated time,” and ensuring more autonomy as project leaders, but this doesn’t go far enough. Quality improvement work is both a part of the General Medical Council’s Good Medical Practice guide and mandatory for UK doctors’ training progression 2. But early career doctors already spend a large proportion of time on administrative tasks, which have been associated with burnout 3…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%