1982
DOI: 10.1177/053331648201500203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Foulkes' Concept of the Matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foulkes's concept of the matrix (Roberts, 1982) addresses specifically the processes occurring in groups. He refers to a web of communication and relationship in a given group, common shared ground, which determines the meaning and significance of all events and upon which all communication (verbal and nonverbal) rests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foulkes's concept of the matrix (Roberts, 1982) addresses specifically the processes occurring in groups. He refers to a web of communication and relationship in a given group, common shared ground, which determines the meaning and significance of all events and upon which all communication (verbal and nonverbal) rests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Foulkes (1964: 76) once individuals come together in a group and begin the process of relating and communicating in myriad ways, a ‘psyche group’ is formed, and it is these conscious and unconscious communications and relationships in and around the group that he terms ‘the matrix’. In its original Latin, the word meant pregnant animal, but it later came to mean womb—a place in which formation takes place (Roberts, 1982). It also has a number of interesting mathematical meanings but within the context of group analysis it is described as the ‘Great Mother’ by Prodgers (1990), the ‘womb’ by Ahlin (1985), a ‘mother’ by Foguel (1994) and related to Winnicott’s (1960) concept of ‘maternal holding’ by James (1984).…”
Section: Foulkes and The Evolution Of The Group Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of commentators have suggested that an optimum number for a supervision group would be 4 to 6 supervisees (Aronson 1990;Proctor 2000;Sharpe 1995). However, in addition, I would like to suggest that more important than the number of supervisees is a qualitative judgement about how many 'patients' the group matrix (Roberts 1982) could reasonably be expected to contain. The issue here is that reflection on practice must have a clear focus and should grow out of and away from a centre that has been closely observed.…”
Section: Some Initial Structural Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%