2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering work engagement: The role of the psychological contract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
81
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
81
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We adapted items for psychology contracts from the studies of Soares and Mosquera ( 2019 ) and Lu et al ( 2016 ) and modified them on the basis of the concept of psychological contracts in the virtual community context by Wei et al ( 2018 ). The measures of community identification were adapted from Wang and Wei ( 2011 ).…”
Section: Research Design and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adapted items for psychology contracts from the studies of Soares and Mosquera ( 2019 ) and Lu et al ( 2016 ) and modified them on the basis of the concept of psychological contracts in the virtual community context by Wei et al ( 2018 ). The measures of community identification were adapted from Wang and Wei ( 2011 ).…”
Section: Research Design and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, these authors proposed a relatively narrow definition from the perspective of the individual as the central element and defined the psychological contract as "individual's beliefs, shaped by the organization, regarding terms of an exchange agreement between individuals and their organization (or another person)" [9,29,30]. Unlike the legal employment contract, the psychological contract exhibits a subjective character because it is implicit but relies on individuals' perception regarding reciprocal obligations between themselves and their employing organization [6,31]. Researchers typically account for the mechanisms underlying psychological contracts using SET [32] because its central concept is the norm of reciprocity [33].…”
Section: Psychological Contract Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychological contract encompasses the substantial psychological aspects of the employer‐employee relationship that are not part of the (legal) employment contract (Soares & Mosquera, 2019), and is therefore an integral and internal aspect of good employer branding (Biswas & Suar, 2016). When employees feel that their psychological contract has been violated for whatever reason, their affinity to the employer brand is severely affected and results in negative outcomes for the employer brand, such as lack of loyalty (Abimbola et al, 2010; Moroko & Uncles, 2008).…”
Section: Background and Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While online brand citizenship behaviours are largely externally‐focused in that they capture behaviours reflective of employees' identification with their employer brand, but enacted on social media, it is also important to consider more internal aspects of the employees' relationship with the employer brand. Similar to the voluntary, extra‐role nature of online brand citizenship behaviour, there are psychological aspects of an employees' relationship with the employer brand that are not part of the formal employment contract; these are encapsulated under the theoretical concept of psychological contract (Biswas & Suar, 2016; Soares & Mosquera, 2019). Viewed from a SIT perspective, the fulfilment/violation of psychological contract, which consists of unwritten beliefs that employees hold in relation to their employer brand's obligations towards them, is closely linked to their identification with the employer brand (Löhndorf & Diamantopoulos, 2014; Ye at al., 2012).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%