Fostering the Future: Resilience Theory and the Practice of Positive Psychology

Yates, Tuppett M.; Masten, Ann S.

doi:10.1002/9780470939338.ch32

Cited by 157 publications

(115 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

102

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The emergent of this model hales from the theory of positive psychology and integration of theories which views students as the individual with potencies and sources [35]. Strengths-based counseling is aimed to substitute the traditional counseling model which focused on deficit condition and problems in individual mental illness and symptoms and be cured by remedial and clinical treatment with the counselor as the centre of the activities [36,37].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Students' Resilience: Comparing The Effect of Cognitive-Behavior And Strengths-Based Counseling

Suranata¹,

Atmoko²,

Hidayah³

2017

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines (ICIRAD 2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-This randomized control trial study was aimed to compare the effect of cognitive-behavioral counseling and strengths-based counseling models towards the resilience students. The 99 students participants of the study were assigned randomly into three different conditions as follows; 32 students in cognitive-behavioral counseling group; 33 students in the strengths-based counseling group; and 34 students as the waiting-list control. The data was gathered by using the 14 items of the psychological resilience scale. The data of the study was analyzed using RM-ANCOVA. The results of the study indicated that: (1) there are statistically significant of enhancing the resilience of both participants in cognitive-behavioral counseling and strengths-based counseling group, and (2) the resilience of the students in the cognitive-behavioral counseling group is significantly higher than students in the strengths-based counseling group or in the waiting-list control group. The conclusion is that the cognitive-behavioral counseling is more effective than the strengths-based counseling model.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enhancing Students' Resilience: Comparing The Effect of Cognitive-Behavior And Strengths-Based Counseling

Suranata¹,

Atmoko²,

Hidayah³

2017

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines (ICIRAD 2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(Wolters, 2003;González-Torres, 2012). Por otra parte, la larga tradición de estudio sobre resiliencia y su visión optimista sobre las posibilidades de todos los individuos para hacer frente con éxito a la adversidad se ha unido con fuerza a las investigaciones, objetivos y metas de la Psicología Positiva (Chung, 2011;Masten, 2004; Vargas y González-Torres;…”

Section: Importancia De Los Factores Motivacionales-afectivos En El Aunclassified

Perfiles de Resiliencia y Estrategias de Afrontamiento en la Universidad: Variables Contextuales y Demográficas

González-Torres

Artuch-Garde

2017

EJREP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenIntroducción. En las dos últimas décadas y en relación con la educación de las llamadas competencias del S.XXI se está prestando una atención creciente al papel desempeñado por los factores no cognitivos en el aprendizaje, el éxito académico, social y profesional. En este marco hay dos variables muy interrelacionadas, resiliencia y afrontamiento que son determinantes de la conducta frente al estrés en contextos académicos y sólo recientemente han empezando a ser objeto de atención en el ámbito universitario.Método. Un total de 117 alumnos universitarios participaron en este estudio en el que se aplicó la escala de afrontamiento EEC y la escala de resiliencia CD-RISC. Se realizaron análisis descriptivos, de asociación y MANOVAS para comprobar el perfil resiliente y de estrategias de afrontamiento ante el estrés de los alumnos, observar el tipo de relación entre ambos constructos y analizar el posible efecto de las variables sexo y tipo de universidad sobre su perfil resiliente y de estrategias de afrontamiento.Resultados. Se destaca una puntuación media-alta en resiliencia y un uso general de estrategias de afrontamiento centradas en el problema. Se resalta la relación positiva y significativa entre las variables analizadas y se confirman efectos del sexo y tipo de universidad sobre factores como tenacidad, espiritualidad, autoinstrucciones, acción dirigida a las causas, reevaluación positiva y firmeza y apoyo religioso entre otros. Discusión y conclusiones. Los resultados proporcionan evidencia acerca de las conexionesentre resiliencia y las estrategias de afrontamiento en este ámbito y ofrecen información de interés sobre cómo algunos indicadores de ambas variables son sensibles a la influencia del género y del contexto (tipo de universidad). Se destaca la necesidad de seguir profundizando en estas cuestiones y se apunta su interés para los servicios de admisión y orientación universitarios.Palabras Clave: resiliencia, estrategias de afrontamiento, universidad, género. Profiles of resilience and coping strategies at university: contextual and demographic variables Abstract Introduction. In the past two decades and increase attention is been paid in the importance of

show abstract

“…A significant amount of variance has been accounted for in adolescent problem behaviors, health behaviors and prosocial behaviors, based on analyses derived from this model that capture risk and protective factors. Empirical findings show that there is substantial support for the moderating influence of protective factors on the impact of risk factors, with substantial protection weakening the impact of risk factors on adolescents' participation in problem behaviors, health enhancing behaviors, and prosocial behavior (CSR, 1997;Yates & Masten, 2004). The robustness of risk and protective factors in accounting for significant variance in specific risk behavior outcomes continues over time, and extends across multiple outcome criteria, for males and females, younger and older adolescents, different socioeconomic groups, races and ethnicities, and national and international samples (Jessor, 2004).…”

Section: Chapter Ii: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, Yates and Masten's (2004) resilience framework, Bogenschneider's (1996) risk and protective processes, and research studies CSR Incorporated, 1995) considered the parent-adolescent relationship more protective than family form with regard to positive developmental outcomes. The studies that considered family structure to be more predictive than parent-adolescent relationships, either did not consider parent-adolescent relationships or deemed non-intact structures to be detrimental to these relationships.…”

Section: Co-occurrence Of Risk Behaviorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Wallace and Bachman (1991) concurred with this contention, indicating that adolescents in two-parent households were less likely to engage in substance use. Although family structure is given, efforts may be made through targeted interventions to circumvent the potentially adverse effects of presumably less than optimal family forms, for example, linking adolescents with positive adult models to promote prosocial behavior is considered protective (Yates & Masten, 2004). Mentoring, through role modeling, tutoring and encouragement, provides the guidance and support from a non-resident adult that improve parent-adolescent relationship and lead to associated improvements in academic and behavioral outcomes (Rhodes et al, 2000).…”

Section: Role Of Family Structure In Substance Use and Sexual Activitmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Promoting Positive Development: Family Processes and Risk Behavior Among Adolescents

McDermott¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study is designed to address the problem of risk behaviors among adolescents, in an effort to promote positive developmental trajectories. Previous studies have resulted in divergent findings pertaining to the predictors of adolescent engagement in risk behaviors. In addition to considering this divergence, the focus of the study is the nature of bidirectional individual  contextual relationships and their influence on adolescent engagement in risk behaviors. The study tested two models that considered whether parent-adolescent relationship or peer relationship mediated the relation between theory and research-based predictors and the endogenous variable, co-occurring substance use and sexual activity. Participants were 396 demographically diverse multiproblem adolescents from an archived dataset derived from an HIV risk reduction outpatient treatment program for alcohol and other drug use. Participants responded to questions that measured family structure, parent-adolescent relationship quality and communication, religiosity, school connectedness, peer relationship, and engagement in substance use and sexual activity. The study found that the model with peer relationship iv as the mediator fit the data better than the model with the parent-adolescent relationship mediator, and that the mediated model provided a better fit to the data than direct relations between the exogenous and endogenous variables. The results suggested also that primary caregiver was not a significant predictor of adolescent participation in cooccurring substance use and sexual activity. The present study provides a holistic theoretical and conceptual framework that highlights a constellation of factors determined to contribute significantly to co-occurring substance use and sexual activity, and thereby reshape existing models of risk behavior among adolescents. To all the adolescents who have managed, through various efforts, to reverse course after embarking on a negative trajectory.vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

show abstract

Fostering the Future: Resilience Theory and the Practice of Positive Psychology

Cited by 157 publications

References 39 publications

Enhancing Students' Resilience: Comparing The Effect of Cognitive-Behavior And Strengths-Based Counseling

Enhancing Students' Resilience: Comparing The Effect of Cognitive-Behavior And Strengths-Based Counseling

Perfiles de Resiliencia y Estrategias de Afrontamiento en la Universidad: Variables Contextuales y Demográficas

Promoting Positive Development: Family Processes and Risk Behavior Among Adolescents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About