2013
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.628930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering the Development of European Regions: A Spatial Dynamic Panel Data Analysis of the Impact of Cohesion Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From a methodological perspective, all these papers use “generalized propensity score” (GPS) matching (Hirano & Imbens, ; Imai & Van Dijk, ), a nonparametric method to estimate treatment effects conditional on observable determinants of treatment intensity. Finally, Bouayad‐Agha, Turpin, and Védrine (), using a spatial dynamic panel data analysis, find that EUF facilitated the convergence of Ob. 1 regions to average EU income levels, while the overall effect of EUF was negligible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From a methodological perspective, all these papers use “generalized propensity score” (GPS) matching (Hirano & Imbens, ; Imai & Van Dijk, ), a nonparametric method to estimate treatment effects conditional on observable determinants of treatment intensity. Finally, Bouayad‐Agha, Turpin, and Védrine (), using a spatial dynamic panel data analysis, find that EUF facilitated the convergence of Ob. 1 regions to average EU income levels, while the overall effect of EUF was negligible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Investment in transport infrastructure reduces transportation costs and, according to new economic geography theory [35], through this channel influences economic growth. According to [36], these forces influence the geographical concentration of economic activities and the productive advantage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of studies draw on samples of EU NUTS2 regions and employ cross‐sectional or panel data (Beugelsdijk & Eijffinger, ; Cappelen, Castellacci, Fagerberg, & Verspagen, ; Ederveen, de Groot, & Nahuis, ; Ederveen, Gorter, de Mooji, & Nahuis, ; Esposti & Bussoletti, ; Puigcerver‐Peñalver, ; Rodríguez‐Pose & Fratesi, ). More recent works have attempted to address endogeneity issues by using instrumental variable models in combination with spatial econometric techniques (Bouayad‐Agha, Turpinn, & Védrine, ; Dall'erba & Le Gallo, ; Mohl & Hagen, ; Ramajo, Marquez, Hewings, & Salinas, ). In spite of the large number of studies produced, this literature has not reached a consensus on whether Structural Fund spending is beneficial (Bahr, ; Cappelen et al., ; Becker, Egger, & von Ehrlich, ; Esposti & Bussoletti, ), beneficial under certain conditions (Becker et al., ; Bouayad‐Agha et al., ; Crescenzi & Giua, ; Mohl & Hagen, ; Rodríguez‐Pose & Fratesi, ; Rodriguez‐Pose & Garcilazo, ; ), insignificant (Dall'erba & Le Gallo, ; Garcia‐Milá & McGuire, ) or even detrimental and unjustified (Boldrin & Canova, ; Dall'erba, Guillain, & Le Gallo, ).…”
Section: Institutional Background and Overview Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%