2010
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2010.500537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering the development of critical thinking skills, and reading comprehension of undergraduates using a Web 2.0 tool coupled with a learning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These annotation systems are useful for peer critiques [26], discussions, and brainstorming. However, these annotation systems focus on online materials such as static web pages and documents.…”
Section: Annotation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These annotation systems are useful for peer critiques [26], discussions, and brainstorming. However, these annotation systems focus on online materials such as static web pages and documents.…”
Section: Annotation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer review is a type of collaborative activity commonly used in the classroom where instructors ask the students to write their reflections, share with one another, and critique each other's work in small groups (Mendenhall, 2010;Samuel et al, 2011;van der Pol, van den Berg, Admiraal, & Simons, 2008). SA tools afford peer review activities by providing a convenient platform in which interactions among peers can be seamlessly accomplished.…”
Section: Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study (Mendenhall, 2010), students were grouped into pairs providing feedback to one another. The feedback could be either general (one that is not linked to a specific portion of the text) or specific.…”
Section: Peer Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of significant results in the first study suggested that educators should be careful with the design of Web annotation-based learning activities and should consider multiple factors to make sure that the learning outcomes would not be affected by external factors such as the unfamiliarity with the technology. The effectiveness of SAM-LS was also examined by Mendenhall and Johnson (2010), who tried to determine whether there was a change in reading comprehension, critical thinking and meta-cognition skills with the use of different instructional strategies in SAM-LS. The results showed that there was no significant difference in reading comprehension, critical thinking or meta-cognition skills between the experimental groups with different instructional strategies and a control group.…”
Section: Teaching and Learning With Web Annotation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…explore the potential of using Web annotation as a collaborative tool to promote learners' performance in various educational settings (Hwang, Wang, & Sharples, 2007;Johnson, Archibald, & Tenenbaum, 2010;Lin & Tsai, 2011;Mendenhall & Johnson, 2010;Nokelainen, Miettinen, Kurhila, Floréen, & Tirri, 2005;Su, Yang, Hwang, & Zhang, 2010;Wang, 2010;Wolfe, 2008;Yang, Chen, & Shao, 2004;Yang, Zhang, Su, & Tsai, 2011;Yeh & Lo, 2009). Little research, however, has compared the effectiveness of Web annotation in promoting collaborative learning with that of other collaborative tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%