The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fostering Analytic Metacognitive Processes and Reducing Overconfidence by Disfluency: The Role of Contrast Effects

Abstract: Overconfidence leads to premature termination of study and, thus, to decreased performance. The aim of the present study is to improve students' monitoring and control. We assume that disfluency fosters analytic metacognitive processes and thus reduces overconfidence. However, we expect that contrast effects moderate the fluency effects on metacognitive processes because disfluency activates analytic metacognitive processes not only for disfluent but also for succeeding fluent learning material. To test our hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Models that include the interaction of fluency and type of contrast are barely around two times more probable than the main effects model (except for EOL2, showing clear evidence for the interaction effect). However, our results parallel the results of Pieger et al (2017) for contrast effects of perceptual fluency manipulations, using different text material. Thus, we assume that stronger fluency effects on metacognitive judgments can be found when a fluent text is learned first and a disfluent text is learned second.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Models that include the interaction of fluency and type of contrast are barely around two times more probable than the main effects model (except for EOL2, showing clear evidence for the interaction effect). However, our results parallel the results of Pieger et al (2017) for contrast effects of perceptual fluency manipulations, using different text material. Thus, we assume that stronger fluency effects on metacognitive judgments can be found when a fluent text is learned first and a disfluent text is learned second.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Most studies focus on one kind of judgment, predominantly POPs (e.g., Rawson and Dunlosky, 2002) or two kinds of judgments (e.g., POP and RC, Maki et al, 1990). In order to investigate the entire process of learning from texts some researcher included additionally other types of judgments like EOLs, familiarity judgments and comprehension judgments (Pieger et al, 2016(Pieger et al, , 2017. Using the latter approach one may test if fluency activates analytic monitoring not only after reading a disfluent text but also via a short presentation of the fluency manipulation (EOL, see Pieger et al, 2016), and if the fluency effect remains for RC judgments even though the performance test is presented in a fluent manner (Pieger et al, 2017).…”
Section: Effects Of Disfluency On Metacognition: a Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three types of presentation of mixed opinions frequently used in major online shopping platforms in China are categorized into three conditions (i.e., simple, moderately complex, and very complex). Since each cognitive process, requiring conscious control, imposes a cognitive load on working memory that might be used when solving problems, a linear relationship is hypothesized between reviewer-related attribution choices and the perceived difficulty or disfluency (reduced ease of processing) [29] caused by presentation types of mixed opinions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They further capitalize on the idea of postdiction judgments (Griffin et al, 2009), which refers to the idea of utilizing test performance of a previously completed task as a cue on which to base judgments. Others suggest that encoding and retrieval fluency can influence metacognitive judgments (Agarwal et al, 2008; Pieger et al, 2017). All have the same implication that problem-solving entails more accurate cues on which to base metacognitive judgments, reducing overconfidence and increasing metacognitive accuracy (Kant et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%