Abstract.
Clystopsenella Clystopsenella longiventris
Clystopsenella mirabilisC. longiventris evidence regarding possible host associations or behaviors have been published (e.g., Day, 1977;Evans et al., 1979;Brothers, 1981). Melo (2000) reported that Pristapenesia stricta (Azevedo) developed gregariously as idiobiont parasitoids of anobiid larvae (Bostrichoidea: Anobiidae). In this species, the adult female digs her way into the beetle's tunnels and upon discovering the larva proceeds to sting it and deposit several eggs along the immobilized larva. Once the wasp's larvae eclose, they feed gregariously on the beetle until eventually spinning their pupal cocoons. During the same study, Melo (2000) was able to document sibling mating and noted that this, along with their association with wood-boring beetle hosts, likely confers upon scolebythids an ease for becoming adventive. Indeed, accidental introduction had already been suggested as a possible explanation for the widely disjunct occurrences of Ycaploca evansi Nagy (Naumann, 1990). Ycaploca evansi has been assumed to develop on larvae of Cerambycidae (Day, 1977;Brothers, 1981), while Scolebythus madecassus Evans was found in presumed beetle burrows in rotting wood (Evans et al., 1979). Fossil scolebythids significantly outnumber the presently known extant species (Aguiar et al., 2013; Table 1). The first fossil scolebythid, Pristapenesia primaeva Brues, was described as a bethylid (as the family Scolebythidae was not established until several decades later) in Middle Eocene Baltic amber (Brues, 1933). Brues (1933) did not recognize the similarity between Pristapenesia Brues and Clystopsenella Kieffer, the only two scolebythids then known and both placed in Bethylidae. It was not until three decades later that Evans (1963) realized, when describing Scolebythus Evans, the distinctiveness of the group from bethylids, although he did not at that time recognize that P. primaeva belonged to the same lineage. Prentice et al. (1996) also did not realize the proper placement of P. primaeva when they described two fossil scolebythids from Lebanese and Dominican amber. Indeed, it was not until Brothers & Janzen (1999) studied a new series of male and female P. primaeva that the proper placement for this genus was discovered, and that the Dominican amber fossil described by Prentice et al. (1996) was congeneric. In fact, it is now understood that Pristapenesia also includes two of the modern species (Azevedo et al., 2011). Subsequently, scolebythids have been discovered in numerous deposits, virtually all being represented by inclusions in amber with the sole exception of two species from Liaoning, China (Cai et al., 2012). Cretaceous scolebythids have been discussed and described from Barremian Lebanese amber (Prentice et al., 1996;Engel & Grimaldi, 2007a; vide Maksoud et al., 2014, on recent dating of these deposits), Barremian Jordanian amber (Kaddumi, 2005: which appears to be an individual of Zapenesia Engel & Grimaldi), Albian Spanish amber , Turonian New Jersey am...